Association of peripheral CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T-cell ratio with SYNTAX score and coronary stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease.

IF 2.4
Wenhao Li, Chunzi Jin, Meina Piao, Xiang Li, Guangming Jin
{"title":"Association of peripheral CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T-cell ratio with SYNTAX score and coronary stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease.","authors":"Wenhao Li, Chunzi Jin, Meina Piao, Xiang Li, Guangming Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is characterized by chronic immune-inflammatory activation. The relationship between the peripheral CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and coronary stenosis severity remains unclear. We investigated its association with SYNTAX score and potential as a complementary marker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts were measured by flow cytometry in 297 patients with CAD and 181 controls. Coronary stenosis was assessed by angiography and SYNTAX score. Multivariable linear regression was used for SYNTAX score, and logistic regression for moderate-to-severe stenosis (SYNTAX > 23). Models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, HbA1c, hs-CRP, creatinine, and medications. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR was applied. ROC analysis assessed incremental value beyond risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CD4+ counts and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio were higher, and CD8+ counts lower, in CAD patients, especially in acute coronary syndromes. In unadjusted analyses, SYNTAX score correlated positively with CD4+ count and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and negatively with CD8+ count (weak to moderate). After adjustment, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio remained independently associated with SYNTAX score (β = 4.88, 95% CI 1.42-8.30, p = 0.006). For SYNTAX > 23, the ratio showed limited discrimination (AUC = 0.598, 95% CI 0.526-0.670; sensitivity 0.587, specificity 0.552 at cutoff 1.90). Adding the ratio to conventional risk factors showed no substantial incremental value (ΔAUC = 0.010, DeLong p = 0.43, NRI = 0.082, IDI = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peripheral T-cell imbalance is associated with greater angiographic coronary complexity in CAD. However, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio has limited discriminatory ability and should be considered a complementary candidate marker, not a standalone diagnostic or predictive tool. Larger prospective multicenter studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":520594,"journal":{"name":"Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)","volume":"81 ","pages":"101211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.101211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is characterized by chronic immune-inflammatory activation. The relationship between the peripheral CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and coronary stenosis severity remains unclear. We investigated its association with SYNTAX score and potential as a complementary marker.

Methods: CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts were measured by flow cytometry in 297 patients with CAD and 181 controls. Coronary stenosis was assessed by angiography and SYNTAX score. Multivariable linear regression was used for SYNTAX score, and logistic regression for moderate-to-severe stenosis (SYNTAX > 23). Models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, HbA1c, hs-CRP, creatinine, and medications. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR was applied. ROC analysis assessed incremental value beyond risk factors.

Results: CD4+ counts and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio were higher, and CD8+ counts lower, in CAD patients, especially in acute coronary syndromes. In unadjusted analyses, SYNTAX score correlated positively with CD4+ count and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and negatively with CD8+ count (weak to moderate). After adjustment, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio remained independently associated with SYNTAX score (β = 4.88, 95% CI 1.42-8.30, p = 0.006). For SYNTAX > 23, the ratio showed limited discrimination (AUC = 0.598, 95% CI 0.526-0.670; sensitivity 0.587, specificity 0.552 at cutoff 1.90). Adding the ratio to conventional risk factors showed no substantial incremental value (ΔAUC = 0.010, DeLong p = 0.43, NRI = 0.082, IDI = 0.006).

Conclusions: Peripheral T-cell imbalance is associated with greater angiographic coronary complexity in CAD. However, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio has limited discriminatory ability and should be considered a complementary candidate marker, not a standalone diagnostic or predictive tool. Larger prospective multicenter studies are required.

冠状动脉病变患者外周血CD4 + /CD8 + t细胞比值与SYNTAX评分和冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的关系
背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)以慢性免疫炎症激活为特征。外周血CD4+/CD8+ t细胞比值与冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了它与SYNTAX评分的关系以及作为补充标记的潜力。方法:采用流式细胞术检测297例冠心病患者和181例对照患者的CD4+和CD8+ t细胞计数。通过血管造影和SYNTAX评分评估冠状动脉狭窄程度。SYNTAX评分采用多变量线性回归,中度至重度狭窄采用logistic回归(SYNTAX > 23)。模型根据年龄、性别、BMI、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟、HbA1c、hs-CRP、肌酐和药物进行调整。benjamin - hochberg FDR被应用。ROC分析评估超出危险因素的增量价值。结果:冠心病患者CD4+计数和CD4+/CD8+比值较高,CD8+计数较低,尤其是急性冠脉综合征患者。在未经调整的分析中,SYNTAX评分与CD4+计数和CD4+/CD8+比值呈正相关,与CD8+计数呈负相关(弱至中度)。调整后,CD4+/CD8+比值仍与SYNTAX评分独立相关(β = 4.88,95% CI 1.42-8.30, p = 0.006)。对于SYNTAX bbb23,该比值显示出有限的鉴别(AUC = 0.598,95% CI 0.526-0.670;敏感度0.587,特异性0.552,截止点为1.90)。将该比值加入常规危险因素后,无明显的增加值(ΔAUC = 0.010,DeLong p = 0.43,NRI = 0.082,IDI = 0.006)。结论:外周血t细胞失衡与冠心病冠状动脉造影复杂性增高有关。然而,CD4+/CD8+比值具有有限的区分能力,应被视为补充的候选标记物,而不是独立的诊断或预测工具。需要更大的前瞻性多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书