What factors are associated with contraceptive method choice during social marketing campaigns in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo? A mixed-methods cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7
BMJ public health Pub Date : 2026-10-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2026-005019
Lionel Muyuku, Harry César Kayembe, Glody-Nickel Mbaa, Tesky Koba, Valentin Mbumba, Paul Samson D Lusamba
{"title":"What factors are associated with contraceptive method choice during social marketing campaigns in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo? A mixed-methods cross-sectional study.","authors":"Lionel Muyuku, Harry César Kayembe, Glody-Nickel Mbaa, Tesky Koba, Valentin Mbumba, Paul Samson D Lusamba","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2026-005019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios worldwide (746 per 100 000 live births), alongside limited access to contraception. Modern contraceptive prevalence remains low, estimated at 11% among women in union. This situation is compounded by insufficient funding and limited government commitment. In this context, social marketing has been considered a strategic response to these challenges.This study aimed to identify factors associated with contraceptive method choice during social marketing family planning campaigns and to explore the perceptions and attitudes of healthcare providers and women users towards these campaigns. The quantitative component included only women who adopted a contraceptive method during campaigns, which limits inference on overall uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study combining an analytical cross-sectional survey with an exploratory qualitative component, conducted in health facilities implementing social marketing campaigns between January 2022 and December 2023 in Kinshasa, DRC.Participants were healthcare providers and 339 women who adopted a contraceptive method during the campaigns.Study variables included sociodemographic characteristics, contraceptive method choice and providers' and users' perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most women (81.7%) opted for implants. Contraceptive method choice was significantly associated with educational level, marital status and exposure to media as a source of campaign information. Implant adoption followed a curvilinear pattern across educational levels, peaking among women with secondary education, and was markedly higher among married women. Rumours and cost were identified as barriers to contraceptive use and access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the continued use of social marketing as a viable strategy to expand contraceptive access. Although social marketing campaigns facilitated access to contraception, substantial challenges persist in the context of the Democratic Republic of Congo, underscoring the need for sustained family planning efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"4 4","pages":"e005019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13663899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2026-005019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios worldwide (746 per 100 000 live births), alongside limited access to contraception. Modern contraceptive prevalence remains low, estimated at 11% among women in union. This situation is compounded by insufficient funding and limited government commitment. In this context, social marketing has been considered a strategic response to these challenges.This study aimed to identify factors associated with contraceptive method choice during social marketing family planning campaigns and to explore the perceptions and attitudes of healthcare providers and women users towards these campaigns. The quantitative component included only women who adopted a contraceptive method during campaigns, which limits inference on overall uptake.

Methods: Sequential explanatory mixed-methods study combining an analytical cross-sectional survey with an exploratory qualitative component, conducted in health facilities implementing social marketing campaigns between January 2022 and December 2023 in Kinshasa, DRC.Participants were healthcare providers and 339 women who adopted a contraceptive method during the campaigns.Study variables included sociodemographic characteristics, contraceptive method choice and providers' and users' perceptions.

Results: Most women (81.7%) opted for implants. Contraceptive method choice was significantly associated with educational level, marital status and exposure to media as a source of campaign information. Implant adoption followed a curvilinear pattern across educational levels, peaking among women with secondary education, and was markedly higher among married women. Rumours and cost were identified as barriers to contraceptive use and access.

Conclusions: These findings support the continued use of social marketing as a viable strategy to expand contraceptive access. Although social marketing campaigns facilitated access to contraception, substantial challenges persist in the context of the Democratic Republic of Congo, underscoring the need for sustained family planning efforts.

在刚果民主共和国金沙萨的社会营销活动中,哪些因素与避孕方法的选择有关?混合方法横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书