Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes.

IF 3.2
Gabriel Valagni, Rafael Alvim Pereira, Gabriel Lenz, Gabriel Barcellos, Tiago Biachi de Castria
{"title":"Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes.","authors":"Gabriel Valagni, Rafael Alvim Pereira, Gabriel Lenz, Gabriel Barcellos, Tiago Biachi de Castria","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2026.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Palliative chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM) yields poor long-term survival. Liver transplantation (LT) is an emerging curative option for highly selected patients with liver-only disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating LT for uCRLM. Overall survival (OS) from comparative studies was pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I V2. Potential patient overlap between cohorts from the same transplant programs was assessed and, where present, only 1 report per cohort contributed to pooling. Seventeen studies were included, with 3 comparative studies providing data for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis favored LT over best alternative therapies (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.72; P = .0009; I² = 3%). This estimate was not robust: the TransMet randomized trial contributed 63% of the pooled weight, and its exclusion rendered the effect nonsignificant (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30-1.35). Comparators were clinically heterogeneous, spanning chemotherapy alone, mixed best alternative therapy, and ALPPS, so the pooled hazard ratio should not be read as a single transferable estimate of transplant benefit. Narrative synthesis indicated 5-year OS rates reached 83% following strict biological selection. Post-transplant recurrence was frequent (72%-81.5%) but often amenable to curative-intent management. Referral data, available only from a conference abstract, suggest that approximately 10% of evaluated patients ultimately undergo LT. In highly selected patients with permanently unresectable, liver-confined CRLM, LT is associated with a survival advantage, although the pooled estimate rests principally on a single randomized trial and should not be generalized across the clinically distinct comparators from which it was derived. The benefit appears to be driven by identifying a ``biological elite'' through stringent selection and aggressive multidisciplinary management of recurrences. PROSPERO registration: CRD42025124542.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2026.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Palliative chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM) yields poor long-term survival. Liver transplantation (LT) is an emerging curative option for highly selected patients with liver-only disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating LT for uCRLM. Overall survival (OS) from comparative studies was pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I V2. Potential patient overlap between cohorts from the same transplant programs was assessed and, where present, only 1 report per cohort contributed to pooling. Seventeen studies were included, with 3 comparative studies providing data for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis favored LT over best alternative therapies (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.72; P = .0009; I² = 3%). This estimate was not robust: the TransMet randomized trial contributed 63% of the pooled weight, and its exclusion rendered the effect nonsignificant (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30-1.35). Comparators were clinically heterogeneous, spanning chemotherapy alone, mixed best alternative therapy, and ALPPS, so the pooled hazard ratio should not be read as a single transferable estimate of transplant benefit. Narrative synthesis indicated 5-year OS rates reached 83% following strict biological selection. Post-transplant recurrence was frequent (72%-81.5%) but often amenable to curative-intent management. Referral data, available only from a conference abstract, suggest that approximately 10% of evaluated patients ultimately undergo LT. In highly selected patients with permanently unresectable, liver-confined CRLM, LT is associated with a survival advantage, although the pooled estimate rests principally on a single randomized trial and should not be generalized across the clinically distinct comparators from which it was derived. The benefit appears to be driven by identifying a ``biological elite'' through stringent selection and aggressive multidisciplinary management of recurrences. PROSPERO registration: CRD42025124542.

肝移植治疗不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移:生存结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书