Antibiotic prescribing appropriateness among critically ill patients at a single tertiary care center in the United Arab Emirates: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2026.1900610
Inas Kassis, Mosab Al Balas, Sheilla Hilal Hamed Rashid, Shabaz Mohiuddin Gulam, Jisha Myalil Lucca, Kimberly Caye McKeirnan, Vineetha Menon
{"title":"Antibiotic prescribing appropriateness among critically ill patients at a single tertiary care center in the United Arab Emirates: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Inas Kassis, Mosab Al Balas, Sheilla Hilal Hamed Rashid, Shabaz Mohiuddin Gulam, Jisha Myalil Lucca, Kimberly Caye McKeirnan, Vineetha Menon","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2026.1900610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite expanding antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, evidence evaluating the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing and its clinical implications in intensive care settings in the United Arab Emirates remains limited. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among intensive care unit patients, identify factors associated with appropriate antibiotic therapy, and examine its association with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Adult patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted between January 2023 and December 2024, had a length of stay exceeding 24 h but less than 30 days, received at least one systemic antibiotic, and had complete medical records were included. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and a regional health information exchange platform. Antibiotic appropriateness was evaluated against institutional or Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 36% of patients received inappropriate antibiotic therapy. The most common reason for inappropriateness was the absence of a clear indication, particularly for postoperative prophylaxis (44.4%). At the individual agent level, cefepime (48.2%), metronidazole (36.2%), and cefazolin (33.9%) exhibited the highest rates of inappropriate use. Multivariable logistic regression identified positive microbiological culture results (AOR = 3.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and sepsis (AOR = 2.12, <i>p</i> = 0.002) as factors independently associated with higher odds of appropriate antibiotic use. Conversely, the presence of a central venous catheter (AOR = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.003) was associated with lower odds of appropriate antibiotic use. Appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with higher odds of organ dysfunction (AOR = 1.69, <i>p</i> = 0.032), nosocomial infection (AOR = 2.28, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and persistent infection despite therapy (AOR = 2.13, <i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately one-third of patients received inappropriate antibiotic therapy, representing a substantial antimicrobial stewardship concern despite the observed strengths in culture-guided therapy and infection-focused management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"6 ","pages":"1900610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1900610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite expanding antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, evidence evaluating the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing and its clinical implications in intensive care settings in the United Arab Emirates remains limited. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among intensive care unit patients, identify factors associated with appropriate antibiotic therapy, and examine its association with clinical outcomes.

Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Adult patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted between January 2023 and December 2024, had a length of stay exceeding 24 h but less than 30 days, received at least one systemic antibiotic, and had complete medical records were included. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and a regional health information exchange platform. Antibiotic appropriateness was evaluated against institutional or Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines.

Results: Overall, 36% of patients received inappropriate antibiotic therapy. The most common reason for inappropriateness was the absence of a clear indication, particularly for postoperative prophylaxis (44.4%). At the individual agent level, cefepime (48.2%), metronidazole (36.2%), and cefazolin (33.9%) exhibited the highest rates of inappropriate use. Multivariable logistic regression identified positive microbiological culture results (AOR = 3.34, p < 0.001) and sepsis (AOR = 2.12, p = 0.002) as factors independently associated with higher odds of appropriate antibiotic use. Conversely, the presence of a central venous catheter (AOR = 0.30, p = 0.003) was associated with lower odds of appropriate antibiotic use. Appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with higher odds of organ dysfunction (AOR = 1.69, p = 0.032), nosocomial infection (AOR = 2.28, p = 0.005), and persistent infection despite therapy (AOR = 2.13, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Approximately one-third of patients received inappropriate antibiotic therapy, representing a substantial antimicrobial stewardship concern despite the observed strengths in culture-guided therapy and infection-focused management.

在阿拉伯联合酋长国的单一三级护理中心重症患者抗生素处方的适当性:一项回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书