Is promoting health equity through a well-being economy a Trojan horse for a post-capitalist socialist economy? Will it make it through the public policy gates?

IF 2.2
Toba Bryant, Dennis Raphael
{"title":"Is promoting health equity through a well-being economy a Trojan horse for a post-capitalist socialist economy? Will it make it through the public policy gates?","authors":"Toba Bryant, Dennis Raphael","doi":"10.1177/2752535X261496407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAttempts to promote health equity through traditional means of public policy advocacy have proven profoundly unsuccessful in Canada. Despite decades of research, policy statements and declarations as to the importance of addressing the causes of health inequalities that prematurely sicken and kill, the quality and equitable distribution of the living and working conditions, i.e., the social determinants of health, continue to decline.PurposeIn this paper we examine the most recent attempt to promote public policy to reverse these developments - the well-being economy - that calls for \"an economy designed to serve people and the planet, not the other way around\" which has similarities with the coexisting concept of a post-capitalist socialist economy.AnalysisWe compare and contrast the assumptions of both approaches through a critical materialist political economy perspective lens and their likelihood of moving the health equity-promoting public policy agenda forward.FindingsWe found most of the well-being economy literature's preferred outcomes are remarkably consistent with the vision of a post-capitalist socialist economy that puts the well-being of people above profit-making. However, the means by which advocates propose these outcomes may come about are profoundly different. The omission of the terms socialist or socialism in the well-being economy literature suggests its advocates may see it as a Trojan Horse for infiltrating these concepts into public policy discourse.ConclusionWe see the well-being economy concept as another well-meaning initiative to promote health equity that is likely to be ignored by governing authorities whose interests are aligned with those for whom such an economy would conflict with their profit-making motives. Instead, we call for explicit consideration of a post-capitalist socialist economy and how it could move us towards a health equity promoting society.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X261496407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X261496407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAttempts to promote health equity through traditional means of public policy advocacy have proven profoundly unsuccessful in Canada. Despite decades of research, policy statements and declarations as to the importance of addressing the causes of health inequalities that prematurely sicken and kill, the quality and equitable distribution of the living and working conditions, i.e., the social determinants of health, continue to decline.PurposeIn this paper we examine the most recent attempt to promote public policy to reverse these developments - the well-being economy - that calls for "an economy designed to serve people and the planet, not the other way around" which has similarities with the coexisting concept of a post-capitalist socialist economy.AnalysisWe compare and contrast the assumptions of both approaches through a critical materialist political economy perspective lens and their likelihood of moving the health equity-promoting public policy agenda forward.FindingsWe found most of the well-being economy literature's preferred outcomes are remarkably consistent with the vision of a post-capitalist socialist economy that puts the well-being of people above profit-making. However, the means by which advocates propose these outcomes may come about are profoundly different. The omission of the terms socialist or socialism in the well-being economy literature suggests its advocates may see it as a Trojan Horse for infiltrating these concepts into public policy discourse.ConclusionWe see the well-being economy concept as another well-meaning initiative to promote health equity that is likely to be ignored by governing authorities whose interests are aligned with those for whom such an economy would conflict with their profit-making motives. Instead, we call for explicit consideration of a post-capitalist socialist economy and how it could move us towards a health equity promoting society.

通过福利经济促进卫生公平是后资本主义社会主义经济的特洛伊木马吗?它能通过公共政策的大门吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书