Ricardo Knauer, Nicholas M Brisson, Georg N Duda, Deborah Falla, David W Evans, Erik Rodner
{"title":"Best subset selection meets resampling: tackling selection instability at very low numbers of events per variable.","authors":"Ricardo Knauer, Nicholas M Brisson, Georg N Duda, Deborah Falla, David W Evans, Erik Rodner","doi":"10.1515/ijb-2025-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trust is a basic necessity for translating machine learning models from bench to bedside. To foster clinicians' trust in predictive models, these models should be interpretable or explainable. A major prerequisite for interpretability or explainability is that feature subsets are stable, i.e., that predictors returned by feature or best subset selection approaches do not change dramatically when the data is perturbed only slightly. However, prior research has shown that stable selections are usually not possible when the number of labels in the smaller class per feature, or outcome events per variable (EPV), is very low, and it remains challenging to build stable, interpretable models in such cases. In this work, we conduct a narrative review in the very low EPV regime and propose to combine cardinality-constrained best subset selection for logistic regression with resampling to tackle the selection instability. We perform a comprehensive evaluation on both synthetic and real-world clinical data, and find that our novel resampling-based model selection procedure yields interpretable feature subsets with a better discriminative performance and stability compared to best subset selection without resampling as well as feature selection with and without resampling. A Python package implementing the proposed methods is available at https://github.com/ml-lab-htw/l0l2learn.</p>","PeriodicalId":50333,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biostatistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2025-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Trust is a basic necessity for translating machine learning models from bench to bedside. To foster clinicians' trust in predictive models, these models should be interpretable or explainable. A major prerequisite for interpretability or explainability is that feature subsets are stable, i.e., that predictors returned by feature or best subset selection approaches do not change dramatically when the data is perturbed only slightly. However, prior research has shown that stable selections are usually not possible when the number of labels in the smaller class per feature, or outcome events per variable (EPV), is very low, and it remains challenging to build stable, interpretable models in such cases. In this work, we conduct a narrative review in the very low EPV regime and propose to combine cardinality-constrained best subset selection for logistic regression with resampling to tackle the selection instability. We perform a comprehensive evaluation on both synthetic and real-world clinical data, and find that our novel resampling-based model selection procedure yields interpretable feature subsets with a better discriminative performance and stability compared to best subset selection without resampling as well as feature selection with and without resampling. A Python package implementing the proposed methods is available at https://github.com/ml-lab-htw/l0l2learn.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Biostatistics (IJB) seeks to publish new biostatistical models and methods, new statistical theory, as well as original applications of statistical methods, for important practical problems arising from the biological, medical, public health, and agricultural sciences with an emphasis on semiparametric methods. Given many alternatives to publish exist within biostatistics, IJB offers a place to publish for research in biostatistics focusing on modern methods, often based on machine-learning and other data-adaptive methodologies, as well as providing a unique reading experience that compels the author to be explicit about the statistical inference problem addressed by the paper. IJB is intended that the journal cover the entire range of biostatistics, from theoretical advances to relevant and sensible translations of a practical problem into a statistical framework. Electronic publication also allows for data and software code to be appended, and opens the door for reproducible research allowing readers to easily replicate analyses described in a paper. Both original research and review articles will be warmly received, as will articles applying sound statistical methods to practical problems.