Psychometric Evaluation of the Discharge Checklist.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sophia Hu, Savanna Plombon, Harshini Malapati, Manraj Kaur, Anuj K Dalal, Maria Edelen
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Discharge Checklist.","authors":"Sophia Hu, Savanna Plombon, Harshini Malapati, Manraj Kaur, Anuj K Dalal, Maria Edelen","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Validated discharge checklists can support discharge planning by enabling patients and care teams to systematically identify issues that hinder safe transitions from the hospital. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a discharge checklist developed for use in a major tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients (>18 y) admitted to the general medicine service between February 2022 and August 2023 were eligible if discharge was anticipated within 24 to 48 hours at the time of approach. Participants completed the 15-item Discharge Checklist, PROMIS-29+2, and GLOBAL-10 questionnaires. Dimensionality was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha and item-total correlations. Construct validity was examined through bivariate and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 patients completed the discharge checklist: 212 (78.81%) were admitted following an emergency room visit, 87 (32.34%) had a hospital stay of 1 to 4 days, 86 (31.97%) had 4 to 5 comorbidities, and 162 (60.22%) were discharged home with self-care. The mean discharge checklist score was 11.42 (SD=3.42). Factor analyses supported a unidimensional model. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach alpha=0.85; item-total correlations 0.19-0.62). In multivariate analyses, younger age, shorter length of stay, and higher cognitive function and mental health were significantly associated with higher discharge checklist scores (ie, more prepared).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The questions in the discharge checklist combined to produce a scale with high internal consistency and construct validity. Future work should evaluate the implementation of these checklists more readily and as part of larger research or quality improvement programs for patients transitioning home.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Validated discharge checklists can support discharge planning by enabling patients and care teams to systematically identify issues that hinder safe transitions from the hospital. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a discharge checklist developed for use in a major tertiary care hospital.

Methods: Adult patients (>18 y) admitted to the general medicine service between February 2022 and August 2023 were eligible if discharge was anticipated within 24 to 48 hours at the time of approach. Participants completed the 15-item Discharge Checklist, PROMIS-29+2, and GLOBAL-10 questionnaires. Dimensionality was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha and item-total correlations. Construct validity was examined through bivariate and multivariable analyses.

Results: A total of 269 patients completed the discharge checklist: 212 (78.81%) were admitted following an emergency room visit, 87 (32.34%) had a hospital stay of 1 to 4 days, 86 (31.97%) had 4 to 5 comorbidities, and 162 (60.22%) were discharged home with self-care. The mean discharge checklist score was 11.42 (SD=3.42). Factor analyses supported a unidimensional model. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach alpha=0.85; item-total correlations 0.19-0.62). In multivariate analyses, younger age, shorter length of stay, and higher cognitive function and mental health were significantly associated with higher discharge checklist scores (ie, more prepared).

Conclusions: The questions in the discharge checklist combined to produce a scale with high internal consistency and construct validity. Future work should evaluate the implementation of these checklists more readily and as part of larger research or quality improvement programs for patients transitioning home.

出院检查表的心理测量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书