Prospectively collected functional vs. self-reported frailty measures and postoperative outcomes after radical cystectomy in older adults with bladder cancer.
Jordan Sheldon, Sarah Holt, Elena Brewer, John L Gore, Jose M Garcia, May Reed, Itay Bentov, Donna Berry, Viraj A Master, Matthew P Kirschenbaum, Marielle Yano, Grace Jun, Casey Li, Sarah P Psutka
{"title":"Prospectively collected functional vs. self-reported frailty measures and postoperative outcomes after radical cystectomy in older adults with bladder cancer.","authors":"Jordan Sheldon, Sarah Holt, Elena Brewer, John L Gore, Jose M Garcia, May Reed, Itay Bentov, Donna Berry, Viraj A Master, Matthew P Kirschenbaum, Marielle Yano, Grace Jun, Casey Li, Sarah P Psutka","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>The optimal tools to measure frailty in patients with bladder cancer are poorly defined. Our objective was to compare baseline physical function with self-reported frailty assessments, and to evaluate associations between functional vs. self-reported frailty assessments and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults ≥65 years old with bladder cancer anticipating radical cystectomy (RC) were preoperatively assessed with the Short Physical Performance and Battery Assessment (SPPB): a physical assessment evaluating balance, gait speed, and lower extremity strength; and the Care and Aging Resilience Evaluation-Geriatric Assessment: a self-reported form which generates a validated frailty index (CARE-FI). Associations between the two frailty measures, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and 90-day grade ≥3 Clavien Dindo complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 53 participants were analyzed. Overall, 3/53 were frail per the CARE-FI, while 1/53 demonstrated poor performance per SPPB criteria. CARE-FI and SPPB frailty categories were strongly associated on an ordinal scale (Kendall's τ-b = 0.88, P = 0.02), agreement between categorical classifications was limited (weighted κ = 0.02). Patients classified as frail or pre-frail by CARE-FI were more likely to experience extended length of stay (≥7 days; P = 0.008, chi-square) and had a longer continuous LOS (P = 0.0013, Wilcoxon rank-sum) and were also more likely to experience a grade ≥3 complication (P = 0.04, chi-square). The SPPB was not significantly associated with either variable per chi squared analysis (P > 0.05 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Functional and self-reported frailty assessments provide different information characterizing individual vulnerability profiles; however, only the CARE-FI was statistically associated with increased LOS and postoperative complications following RC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13674010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.09.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The optimal tools to measure frailty in patients with bladder cancer are poorly defined. Our objective was to compare baseline physical function with self-reported frailty assessments, and to evaluate associations between functional vs. self-reported frailty assessments and postoperative outcomes.
Methods: Adults ≥65 years old with bladder cancer anticipating radical cystectomy (RC) were preoperatively assessed with the Short Physical Performance and Battery Assessment (SPPB): a physical assessment evaluating balance, gait speed, and lower extremity strength; and the Care and Aging Resilience Evaluation-Geriatric Assessment: a self-reported form which generates a validated frailty index (CARE-FI). Associations between the two frailty measures, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and 90-day grade ≥3 Clavien Dindo complications were assessed.
Results: About 53 participants were analyzed. Overall, 3/53 were frail per the CARE-FI, while 1/53 demonstrated poor performance per SPPB criteria. CARE-FI and SPPB frailty categories were strongly associated on an ordinal scale (Kendall's τ-b = 0.88, P = 0.02), agreement between categorical classifications was limited (weighted κ = 0.02). Patients classified as frail or pre-frail by CARE-FI were more likely to experience extended length of stay (≥7 days; P = 0.008, chi-square) and had a longer continuous LOS (P = 0.0013, Wilcoxon rank-sum) and were also more likely to experience a grade ≥3 complication (P = 0.04, chi-square). The SPPB was not significantly associated with either variable per chi squared analysis (P > 0.05 for both).
Conclusions: Functional and self-reported frailty assessments provide different information characterizing individual vulnerability profiles; however, only the CARE-FI was statistically associated with increased LOS and postoperative complications following RC.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.