Credit Where Credit's Due: Gynecology Paves the Way for MIS (Minimally Invasive Surgery).

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Camran Nezhat, Barbara Page, Zahra Najmi, Saira Kothari, Neel Ambarge, Isabella Choi, Arman Sirjani, Shreeya Rao Lalam, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat
{"title":"Credit Where Credit's Due: Gynecology Paves the Way for MIS (Minimally Invasive Surgery).","authors":"Camran Nezhat, Barbara Page, Zahra Najmi, Saira Kothari, Neel Ambarge, Isabella Choi, Arman Sirjani, Shreeya Rao Lalam, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2026.00108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of modern-day minimally invasive surgery (MIS) marked a turning point in the history of medicine, driving one of the sharpest declines in surgical mortality and morbidity ever recorded-standing alongside antisepsis and antibiotics as one of the most consequential life-saving advances in medical history. By averting an estimated 10 to 20 million surgical deaths and sparing over 1 billion patients the severe, long-term disabilities once inherent to large-incision approaches, MIS transformed surgical practice across all disciplines within a single generation. As a first-person historical account and companion piece to our systematic outcomes review, this Clinical Opinion reconstructs the lived experience of that paradigm shift: from the haunting realities of 1970s open laparotomy to Camran Nezhat's pioneering transition from eyepiece laparoscopy to monitor-guided operative endoscopy. The author reflects on the personal motivations, technological improvisations, and multidisciplinary collaborations that expanded videoendoscopy beyond diagnostics into complex operative interventions, as well as the fierce institutional resistance that nearly extinguished the movement. Beyond its technical achievements-including dramatic reductions in perioperative blood loss, multiunit transfusions, infections, and hospital stays-MIS catalyzed a fundamental reimagining of surgery itself. It inverted two centuries of surgical doctrine, replacing the belief that \"the bigger the incision, the better the surgeon\" with a new ethos centered on shared visualization, organ preservation, and pathology-directed precision. Ultimately, this narrative highlights the cost of innovation, the role of patients as the true drivers of progress, and the ongoing obligation to ensure equitable global access to minimally invasive and robotic-assisted care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13667899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2026.00108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of modern-day minimally invasive surgery (MIS) marked a turning point in the history of medicine, driving one of the sharpest declines in surgical mortality and morbidity ever recorded-standing alongside antisepsis and antibiotics as one of the most consequential life-saving advances in medical history. By averting an estimated 10 to 20 million surgical deaths and sparing over 1 billion patients the severe, long-term disabilities once inherent to large-incision approaches, MIS transformed surgical practice across all disciplines within a single generation. As a first-person historical account and companion piece to our systematic outcomes review, this Clinical Opinion reconstructs the lived experience of that paradigm shift: from the haunting realities of 1970s open laparotomy to Camran Nezhat's pioneering transition from eyepiece laparoscopy to monitor-guided operative endoscopy. The author reflects on the personal motivations, technological improvisations, and multidisciplinary collaborations that expanded videoendoscopy beyond diagnostics into complex operative interventions, as well as the fierce institutional resistance that nearly extinguished the movement. Beyond its technical achievements-including dramatic reductions in perioperative blood loss, multiunit transfusions, infections, and hospital stays-MIS catalyzed a fundamental reimagining of surgery itself. It inverted two centuries of surgical doctrine, replacing the belief that "the bigger the incision, the better the surgeon" with a new ethos centered on shared visualization, organ preservation, and pathology-directed precision. Ultimately, this narrative highlights the cost of innovation, the role of patients as the true drivers of progress, and the ongoing obligation to ensure equitable global access to minimally invasive and robotic-assisted care.

功劳在应得的地方:妇科为MIS(微创手术)铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书