Comparative Botulinum Toxin Injection Strategies Beyond the Masseter for Bruxism: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Doungkamol Siri-Archawawat, Arunrat Dumkliang, Chime Eden, Weeratian Tawanwongsri
{"title":"Comparative Botulinum Toxin Injection Strategies Beyond the Masseter for Bruxism: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Doungkamol Siri-Archawawat, Arunrat Dumkliang, Chime Eden, Weeratian Tawanwongsri","doi":"10.3390/jcm15197712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Botulinum toxin type A is used to reduce excessive masticatory muscle activity in bruxism, but whether extending injection beyond the masseter provides additional benefit remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to map comparative evidence on expanded botulinum toxin muscle targeting for bruxism and assess whether available studies provide evidence of incremental clinical benefit beyond masseter-only injection. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to 3 August 2026. Eligible studies directly compared botulinum toxin injection strategies differing in the muscles targeted. Data were charted and synthesized descriptively. The protocol was prospectively registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202680008). <b>Results:</b> Five small randomized trials involving 133 participants were included, of whom 116 contributed to the comparative analyses. Expanded strategies added the temporalis, anterior digastric, lateral pterygoid, or medial pterygoid. Additional clinical benefit of broader targeting was not clearly demonstrated, although some studies reported greater reductions in activity of the additionally injected muscle. In all studies, the masseter dose was held constant while additional muscles were injected, resulting in higher total toxin doses and preventing separation of anatomical targeting effects from dose escalation. Safety evidence was insufficient because reporting was limited and heterogeneous, and the small overall sample precluded adequate characterization of the safety profile. <b>Conclusions:</b> The available evidence is preliminary and insufficient to determine whether routinely extending botulinum toxin injection beyond the masseter provides additional clinical benefit. Future adequately powered, dose-controlled trials should prioritize patient-important outcomes and distinguish the effects of anatomical targeting from total toxin dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13665912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxin type A is used to reduce excessive masticatory muscle activity in bruxism, but whether extending injection beyond the masseter provides additional benefit remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to map comparative evidence on expanded botulinum toxin muscle targeting for bruxism and assess whether available studies provide evidence of incremental clinical benefit beyond masseter-only injection. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to 3 August 2026. Eligible studies directly compared botulinum toxin injection strategies differing in the muscles targeted. Data were charted and synthesized descriptively. The protocol was prospectively registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202680008). Results: Five small randomized trials involving 133 participants were included, of whom 116 contributed to the comparative analyses. Expanded strategies added the temporalis, anterior digastric, lateral pterygoid, or medial pterygoid. Additional clinical benefit of broader targeting was not clearly demonstrated, although some studies reported greater reductions in activity of the additionally injected muscle. In all studies, the masseter dose was held constant while additional muscles were injected, resulting in higher total toxin doses and preventing separation of anatomical targeting effects from dose escalation. Safety evidence was insufficient because reporting was limited and heterogeneous, and the small overall sample precluded adequate characterization of the safety profile. Conclusions: The available evidence is preliminary and insufficient to determine whether routinely extending botulinum toxin injection beyond the masseter provides additional clinical benefit. Future adequately powered, dose-controlled trials should prioritize patient-important outcomes and distinguish the effects of anatomical targeting from total toxin dose.

比较肉毒杆菌毒素注射策略超越磨牙:范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书