Digital Health Among Educators: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Weiyan Liao, Min Qiu, Dandan Wu, Xianhan Huang, Junjun Chen, Minjuan Wang, Hui Li
{"title":"Digital Health Among Educators: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Weiyan Liao, Min Qiu, Dandan Wu, Xianhan Huang, Junjun Chen, Minjuan Wang, Hui Li","doi":"10.3390/healthcare14193313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital health technologies are increasingly used to support health management, monitoring, and health-related practices. Educators face a range of physical and mental health challenges, yet research on educators' digital health remains fragmented across educational settings, geographical contexts, and forms of digital health management. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the literature on educators' digital health by examining (1) digital health literacy and related competencies; (2) experiences with digital health technologies, and (3) factors influencing educators' capacity to navigate the digital health ecosystem. <b>Methods:</b> The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted for English written empirical peer-reviewed articles related to educators' digital health on 8 June 2026. <b>Results:</b> A total of 31 studies were included. Three themes were identified. First, educators' digital health literacy varied across demographic groups and educational settings in different geographical contexts and was associated with health behaviors and well-being. Second, educators engaged with mobile applications, wearable devices, AI-driven technologies, telehealth, and online programs. Third, educators' engagement with these technologies was shaped by individual, technological, organizational, and contextual factors, including leadership support, privacy concerns, time pressure, and workplace culture. <b>Conclusions:</b> This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of educators' digital health, covering digital health literacy, experiences with digital health technologies, and factors influencing engagement. The findings highlight uneven digital health literacy, varied experiences with digital technologies, and the importance of institutional support. They also underscore the need for targeted capacity-building initiatives, context-sensitive interventions, and further research to strengthen educators' digital health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"14 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13665240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14193313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital health technologies are increasingly used to support health management, monitoring, and health-related practices. Educators face a range of physical and mental health challenges, yet research on educators' digital health remains fragmented across educational settings, geographical contexts, and forms of digital health management. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the literature on educators' digital health by examining (1) digital health literacy and related competencies; (2) experiences with digital health technologies, and (3) factors influencing educators' capacity to navigate the digital health ecosystem. Methods: The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted for English written empirical peer-reviewed articles related to educators' digital health on 8 June 2026. Results: A total of 31 studies were included. Three themes were identified. First, educators' digital health literacy varied across demographic groups and educational settings in different geographical contexts and was associated with health behaviors and well-being. Second, educators engaged with mobile applications, wearable devices, AI-driven technologies, telehealth, and online programs. Third, educators' engagement with these technologies was shaped by individual, technological, organizational, and contextual factors, including leadership support, privacy concerns, time pressure, and workplace culture. Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of educators' digital health, covering digital health literacy, experiences with digital health technologies, and factors influencing engagement. The findings highlight uneven digital health literacy, varied experiences with digital technologies, and the importance of institutional support. They also underscore the need for targeted capacity-building initiatives, context-sensitive interventions, and further research to strengthen educators' digital health.

教育工作者的数字健康:范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书