A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Model of Care for Domestic Violence Within the Emergency Department.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Azhaan Haq, Kimberley R Allison, Helen Rhodes, Craig Peter Coorey, Natalie Edmiston
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Model of Care for Domestic Violence Within the Emergency Department.","authors":"Azhaan Haq, Kimberley R Allison, Helen Rhodes, Craig Peter Coorey, Natalie Edmiston","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the scope and extent of the Domestic Violence (DV) Model of Care at Campbelltown Emergency Department (ED). We detail patient population characteristics, means of identifying victim-survivors, care provided, and factors associated with social work review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods evaluation utilised (1) retrospective audits of medical records of patients admitted to Campbelltown ED in 2024, who (a) responded affirmatively on the DV Routine Screening (DVRS) tool, and/or (b) were reviewed by social work relating to DV; and (2) semi-structured interviews with 19 clinicians and support workers about their understanding of and role within the model of care. Descriptive analyses quantified the scope and characteristics of the DV patient population and care provision; logistic regression identified factors associated with DVRS-identified patients seeing social work. Thematic analysis of interview data supplemented audit findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2024, 249 ED patients responded affirmatively to the DVRS tool (DV identified prior for 52.2%), and 231 patients were reviewed by social work relating to DV. Victim-survivors were identified through DVRS tool use, explicit disclosure, referral from community partners, and clinician judgement. Transfer to the ED short stay unit facilitated safety and trauma/violence-informed care, including social work consultation for 49.8% of identified victim-survivors. Explicit disclosure or help-seeking, presenting concerns, and child safety risks were associated with seeing social work; however, presentation day/time was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evaluation demonstrates that a comprehensive ED model of care, employing multiple means of identifying victim-survivors, is able to facilitate trauma/violence-informed psychosocial care alongside medical management for patients experiencing DV.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"38 5","pages":"e70371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the scope and extent of the Domestic Violence (DV) Model of Care at Campbelltown Emergency Department (ED). We detail patient population characteristics, means of identifying victim-survivors, care provided, and factors associated with social work review.

Methods: This mixed-methods evaluation utilised (1) retrospective audits of medical records of patients admitted to Campbelltown ED in 2024, who (a) responded affirmatively on the DV Routine Screening (DVRS) tool, and/or (b) were reviewed by social work relating to DV; and (2) semi-structured interviews with 19 clinicians and support workers about their understanding of and role within the model of care. Descriptive analyses quantified the scope and characteristics of the DV patient population and care provision; logistic regression identified factors associated with DVRS-identified patients seeing social work. Thematic analysis of interview data supplemented audit findings.

Results: In 2024, 249 ED patients responded affirmatively to the DVRS tool (DV identified prior for 52.2%), and 231 patients were reviewed by social work relating to DV. Victim-survivors were identified through DVRS tool use, explicit disclosure, referral from community partners, and clinician judgement. Transfer to the ED short stay unit facilitated safety and trauma/violence-informed care, including social work consultation for 49.8% of identified victim-survivors. Explicit disclosure or help-seeking, presenting concerns, and child safety risks were associated with seeing social work; however, presentation day/time was not.

Conclusions: This evaluation demonstrates that a comprehensive ED model of care, employing multiple means of identifying victim-survivors, is able to facilitate trauma/violence-informed psychosocial care alongside medical management for patients experiencing DV.

急诊科家庭暴力护理模式的混合方法评价
目的:描述坎贝尔镇急诊科(ED)家庭暴力(DV)护理模式的范围和程度。我们详细介绍了患者群体特征、识别受害者-幸存者的方法、提供的护理以及与社会工作审查相关的因素。方法:这种混合方法评估利用(1)对2024年坎贝尔镇急诊科入院的患者的医疗记录进行回顾性审计,这些患者(a)对家庭暴力常规筛查(DVRS)工具有肯定的反应,和/或(b)通过与家庭暴力有关的社会工作进行了审查;(2)对19名临床医生和支持工作者进行半结构化访谈,了解他们对护理模式的理解及其在护理模式中的作用。描述性分析量化了家庭暴力患者群体和护理提供的范围和特征;逻辑回归确定了与dvrs识别的患者接受社会工作相关的因素。面谈数据的专题分析补充了审计结果。结果:2024年,249例ED患者对DVRS工具有肯定反应(先前确定DV的占52.2%),231例患者通过DV相关的社会工作进行了评估。通过DVRS工具的使用、明确披露、社区合作伙伴的转诊和临床医生的判断来确定受害者-幸存者。转到急诊科的短期住院病房促进了安全和创伤/暴力知情护理,包括为49.8%的已确定的受害者-幸存者提供社会工作咨询。明确披露或寻求帮助、提出关切和儿童安全风险与参加社会工作有关;然而,演讲日期/时间不是。结论:该评估表明,综合ED护理模式,采用多种识别受害者-幸存者的方法,能够促进创伤/暴力知情的心理社会护理以及对遭受家庭暴力的患者的医疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书