Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitors in Lung Transplant Recipients: Near-Universal Use Without Clear Impact on Clinical Outcomes Over a 20-Year Observational Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Chen Yang Kevin Zhang, Rayoun Ramendra, Meghan Aversa, Rasheed Ghany, Jussi Tikkanen, Ella Huszti, Jonathan Yeung, Shaf Keshavjee, Lianne G Singer, Tereza Martinu
{"title":"Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitors in Lung Transplant Recipients: Near-Universal Use Without Clear Impact on Clinical Outcomes Over a 20-Year Observational Study.","authors":"Chen Yang Kevin Zhang, Rayoun Ramendra, Meghan Aversa, Rasheed Ghany, Jussi Tikkanen, Ella Huszti, Jonathan Yeung, Shaf Keshavjee, Lianne G Singer, Tereza Martinu","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a known risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), the main barrier to long-term survival in lung transplant recipients (LTR). While proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are effective for symptomatic treatment of GERD, data are sparse on the prevalence of long-term PPI use and association with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort of adult first-time LTR between 1999 to 2018 who were alive and CLAD-free at 1-year post-transplant. PPI exposure was defined as ≥8 continuous weeks in the first year, started within 6 months post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1308 LTR were included, with 1170 (89.4%) exposed to PPI. PPI use increased over time and remained above 90% from 2007 onwards. In multivariable analyses, LTR on PPI had similar time to CLAD and time to death/retransplant compared to those not on PPI. Similarly, no differences in outcomes were observed between LTR on once-daily and twice-daily dosing, or after accounting for the number of reflux episodes on 24 h pH-impedance monitoring. Positive bronchoalveolar lavage cultures and acute rejection over the first-year post-transplant was also comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term use of PPI became near-universal without observable effect on clinical outcomes. While further research is needed, these findings question the routine use of PPI in LTR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"40 10","pages":"e70706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13670396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a known risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), the main barrier to long-term survival in lung transplant recipients (LTR). While proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are effective for symptomatic treatment of GERD, data are sparse on the prevalence of long-term PPI use and association with clinical outcomes.

Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort of adult first-time LTR between 1999 to 2018 who were alive and CLAD-free at 1-year post-transplant. PPI exposure was defined as ≥8 continuous weeks in the first year, started within 6 months post-transplant.

Results: 1308 LTR were included, with 1170 (89.4%) exposed to PPI. PPI use increased over time and remained above 90% from 2007 onwards. In multivariable analyses, LTR on PPI had similar time to CLAD and time to death/retransplant compared to those not on PPI. Similarly, no differences in outcomes were observed between LTR on once-daily and twice-daily dosing, or after accounting for the number of reflux episodes on 24 h pH-impedance monitoring. Positive bronchoalveolar lavage cultures and acute rejection over the first-year post-transplant was also comparable.

Conclusions: Long-term use of PPI became near-universal without observable effect on clinical outcomes. While further research is needed, these findings question the routine use of PPI in LTR.

长期质子泵抑制剂在肺移植受者中的应用:近20年观察性研究对临床结果无明显影响
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)是慢性同种异体肺移植功能障碍(CLAD)的已知危险因素,是肺移植受者(LTR)长期生存的主要障碍。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPI)对胃食管反流的对症治疗有效,但关于长期使用PPI的患病率及其与临床结果的关联的数据很少。方法:1999年至2018年间首次LTR的成人单中心回顾性队列,移植后1年存活且无clad。PPI暴露定义为在移植后6个月内开始的第一年连续≥8周。结果:纳入1308例LTR,其中1170例(89.4%)暴露于PPI。PPI的使用随着时间的推移而增加,从2007年起一直保持在90%以上。在多变量分析中,与未接受PPI治疗的患者相比,接受PPI治疗的LTR与接受CLAD治疗的时间和死亡/再移植的时间相似。同样,在每日一次和每日两次给药的LTR之间,或在24小时ph -阻抗监测中考虑反流发作次数后,没有观察到结果的差异。移植后一年内支气管肺泡灌洗培养阳性和急性排斥反应也具有可比性。结论:长期使用PPI几乎是普遍的,对临床结果没有可观察到的影响。虽然需要进一步的研究,但这些发现质疑了在LTR中常规使用PPI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书