From Diagnosis to Decision-Making: AI-Driven Triage of Oral Mucosal Lesions Detected on Intraoral Photographs.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Julia Schwärzler, Ekaterina Tolstaya, Antonin Tichy, Tami Yap, Michael McCullough, Yoana Malenova, David Steybe, Sven Otto, Sebastian Paris, Falk Schwendicke
{"title":"From Diagnosis to Decision-Making: AI-Driven Triage of Oral Mucosal Lesions Detected on Intraoral Photographs.","authors":"Julia Schwärzler, Ekaterina Tolstaya, Antonin Tichy, Tami Yap, Michael McCullough, Yoana Malenova, David Steybe, Sven Otto, Sebastian Paris, Falk Schwendicke","doi":"10.1111/adj.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Managing oral mucosal lesions in general dental practice is challenging, as visually similar conditions may require very different treatments. We developed an AI-based triage system connecting intraoral image analysis with guideline-based treatment recommendations, tested it externally, and compared its performance with clinicians' recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 were trained on 4079 intraoral photographs to classify 11 oral mucosal lesion types. These were mapped into five treatment tiers defined by urgency and management aim: T1 specialist referral for malignant and high-risk lesions, T2 interdisciplinary referral for specialist-led non-cancer management, T3 risk-adapted surveillance, T4 dental treatment with reassessment, and T5 no treatment. Model performance was compared with two general dentists and four specialists on an internal test set. YOLOv11 was additionally tested on an external dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>YOLOv11 outperformed YOLOv8 in macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving 0.72, 0.74, and 0.73 respectively. However, 25% of T1 high-risk cases were under-triaged. YOLOv11 significantly outperformed all clinicians, whose F1 scores ranged from 0.33 to 0.69. External performance decreased markedly (F1 score: 0.58), consistent with domain shift.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guideline-oriented AI triage is feasible but requires multicentre training for improved generalizability, as well as safety-focused optimization, and prospective user evaluation before clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":8593,"journal":{"name":"Australian dental journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.70079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Managing oral mucosal lesions in general dental practice is challenging, as visually similar conditions may require very different treatments. We developed an AI-based triage system connecting intraoral image analysis with guideline-based treatment recommendations, tested it externally, and compared its performance with clinicians' recommendations.

Methods: YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 were trained on 4079 intraoral photographs to classify 11 oral mucosal lesion types. These were mapped into five treatment tiers defined by urgency and management aim: T1 specialist referral for malignant and high-risk lesions, T2 interdisciplinary referral for specialist-led non-cancer management, T3 risk-adapted surveillance, T4 dental treatment with reassessment, and T5 no treatment. Model performance was compared with two general dentists and four specialists on an internal test set. YOLOv11 was additionally tested on an external dataset.

Results: YOLOv11 outperformed YOLOv8 in macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving 0.72, 0.74, and 0.73 respectively. However, 25% of T1 high-risk cases were under-triaged. YOLOv11 significantly outperformed all clinicians, whose F1 scores ranged from 0.33 to 0.69. External performance decreased markedly (F1 score: 0.58), consistent with domain shift.

Conclusion: Guideline-oriented AI triage is feasible but requires multicentre training for improved generalizability, as well as safety-focused optimization, and prospective user evaluation before clinical use.

从诊断到决策:人工智能驱动的口腔黏膜病变口腔内照片的分类。
背景:在一般牙科实践中处理口腔黏膜病变是具有挑战性的,因为视觉上相似的情况可能需要非常不同的治疗方法。我们开发了一种基于人工智能的分诊系统,将口腔内图像分析与基于指南的治疗建议联系起来,对其进行外部测试,并将其性能与临床医生的建议进行比较。方法:对4079张口腔内照片进行YOLOv8和YOLOv11训练,对11种口腔黏膜病变类型进行分类。根据急迫性和管理目标划分为5个治疗级别:T1为恶性和高危病变的专科转诊,T2为专科领导的非癌症管理的跨学科转诊,T3风险适应监测,T4牙科治疗并重新评估,T5不治疗。在一个内部测试集中,将模型的性能与两位普通牙医和四位专家进行了比较。YOLOv11还在外部数据集上进行了测试。结果:YOLOv11在宏观平均精度、召回率和F1得分上分别达到0.72、0.74和0.73,优于YOLOv8。然而,T1高危病例中有25%的患者分类不足。YOLOv11的表现明显优于所有临床医生,其F1评分范围为0.33 ~ 0.69。外部绩效显著下降(F1得分:0.58),与域漂移一致。结论:以指南为导向的人工智能分诊是可行的,但需要多中心培训以提高通用性,并在临床使用前进行以安全为重点的优化和前瞻性用户评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian dental journal
Australian dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Dental Journal provides a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dentistry, promoting the discipline of dentistry in Australia and throughout the world. It comprises peer-reviewed research articles as its core material, supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书