Intraoperative Management Strategies for Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lior Orbach, Guy Levenberg, Noa Gosher, Yonatan Lessing, Nir Lubezky, Guy Lahat
{"title":"Intraoperative Management Strategies for Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study.","authors":"Lior Orbach, Guy Levenberg, Noa Gosher, Yonatan Lessing, Nir Lubezky, Guy Lahat","doi":"10.1177/00031348261499335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhen pancreatic adenocarcinoma is found unresectable during surgery, the decision to perform palliation must balance symptom relief against recovery and subsequent cancer treatment. We compared clinical outcomes after palliative procedures and nontherapeutic exploration.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively studied 201 patients with intraoperatively unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated from 2006 to 2023. Operative findings and procedures were described, and postoperative outcomes, systemic-therapy receipt, and survival were compared using propensity-score overlap weighting.ResultsOf 201 patients, 54 underwent palliation and 147 underwent nontherapeutic exploration. Palliation more often accompanied locally advanced disease and vascular invasion. Observed major complications occurred in 18.5% vs 4.8%, ICU admission in 20.4% vs 3.4%, and 30-day mortality in 11.1% vs 3.4%. Adjusted estimates did not exclude clinically important differences; the ICU-admission odds ratio was 4.40 (95% CI, 0.997-19.43). Systemic-therapy receipt was 46.3% vs 46.9% (weighted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35-1.71). The weighted survival hazard ratio was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.99-2.07).DiscussionPatients selected for palliation experienced more postoperative complications and ICU use, without clearly greater systemic-therapy receipt. Selection differences and uncertainty in adjusted estimates prevent causal conclusions. Operative decisions should prioritize the patient's symptoms, functional status, expected survival, anatomy, and available less-invasive alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261499335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261499335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWhen pancreatic adenocarcinoma is found unresectable during surgery, the decision to perform palliation must balance symptom relief against recovery and subsequent cancer treatment. We compared clinical outcomes after palliative procedures and nontherapeutic exploration.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively studied 201 patients with intraoperatively unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated from 2006 to 2023. Operative findings and procedures were described, and postoperative outcomes, systemic-therapy receipt, and survival were compared using propensity-score overlap weighting.ResultsOf 201 patients, 54 underwent palliation and 147 underwent nontherapeutic exploration. Palliation more often accompanied locally advanced disease and vascular invasion. Observed major complications occurred in 18.5% vs 4.8%, ICU admission in 20.4% vs 3.4%, and 30-day mortality in 11.1% vs 3.4%. Adjusted estimates did not exclude clinically important differences; the ICU-admission odds ratio was 4.40 (95% CI, 0.997-19.43). Systemic-therapy receipt was 46.3% vs 46.9% (weighted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35-1.71). The weighted survival hazard ratio was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.99-2.07).DiscussionPatients selected for palliation experienced more postoperative complications and ICU use, without clearly greater systemic-therapy receipt. Selection differences and uncertainty in adjusted estimates prevent causal conclusions. Operative decisions should prioritize the patient's symptoms, functional status, expected survival, anatomy, and available less-invasive alternatives.

不可切除胰腺癌的术中治疗策略:倾向加权队列研究。
背景:当发现胰腺腺癌在手术中不能切除时,姑息治疗的决定必须在症状缓解、恢复和随后的癌症治疗之间取得平衡。我们比较了姑息治疗和非治疗性探索后的临床结果。患者与方法回顾性分析2006年至2023年间201例术中不可切除的胰腺腺癌患者。描述了手术结果和程序,并使用倾向评分重叠加权比较了术后结果、全身治疗接受情况和生存率。结果201例患者中,54例行姑息治疗,147例行非治疗性探查。姑息更常伴有局部晚期疾病和血管侵犯。观察到的主要并发症发生率为18.5%比4.8%,ICU入院率为20.4%比3.4%,30天死亡率为11.1%比3.4%。调整后的估计值没有排除临床上重要的差异;icu入院优势比为4.40 (95% CI, 0.997-19.43)。系统治疗接受率为46.3% vs 46.9%(加权优势比为0.78;95% CI为0.35-1.71)。加权生存风险比为1.43 (95% CI, 0.99-2.07)。选择姑息治疗的患者有更多的术后并发症和ICU使用,没有明显更高的全身治疗接收。调整估计中的选择差异和不确定性阻碍了因果结论。手术决定应优先考虑患者的症状、功能状态、预期生存期、解剖结构和可用的微创替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书