Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers Measured by Capillary Blood Collection Versus Venous Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sara Ho, Ziling Shen, Alexandria Lewis, Megha Patel, Anny Zheng, Gianna Proscino, Thaovy Ho, Jiangxia Wang, Marilyn Albert, Abhay Moghekar
{"title":"Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers Measured by Capillary Blood Collection Versus Venous Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid.","authors":"Sara Ho, Ziling Shen, Alexandria Lewis, Megha Patel, Anny Zheng, Gianna Proscino, Thaovy Ho, Jiangxia Wang, Marilyn Albert, Abhay Moghekar","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blood biomarkers are increasingly critical for non-invasive Alzheimer's Disease (AD) diagnostics and research but typically require on-site processing. Remote point-of-care collection methods could enhance biomarker testing in clinical and research settings. We evaluated the safety and accuracy of blood collection via venous blood and two capillary blood collection devices (Tasso+ and TAPII) for measurements of amyloid-beta 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40), phosphorylated-tau-217 (pTau217), neurofilament-light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) from capillary plasma to simultaneously collected venous plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients seen at the Johns Hopkins Center for CSF Disorders (N = 192) underwent diagnostic lumbar punctures and venipuncture. Warming packs were held to the skin for 5 min before collecting capillary blood (via TAPII or Tasso+ device) and numeric pain scores. CSF, venous, and capillary plasma were analyzed using Quanterix SIMOA immunoassays. Statistical analysis included Pearson/Spearman correlations, Lasso regression, and quantitative comparisons using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>86 TAPII and 126 Tasso+ plasma samples were collected (77 M, 115 F; mean age 61 ± 18.3 years, range 16-91). Tasso+ devices were 90.3% successful in collecting > 50 μL whole blood, and TAPII devices were 86% successful. Mean pain scores were significantly higher in venous than capillary collections (Venous 2.24/10, TAPII 0.73/10, Tasso+ 0.2/10, p < 0.001). Capillary Aβ42/40, NfL, and GFAP strongly correlated with venous plasma analytes (Tasso+: Aβ42/40 r = 0.75, NfL r = 0.91, GFAP r = 0.80, all p < 0.001; TAPII: Aβ42/40 r = 0.74, NfL r = 0.86, GFAP r = 0.84, all p < 0.001). Tasso+ capillary pTau217 weakly correlated with venous (r = 0.23, p = 0.04). Capillary NfL and GFAP correlated modestly with CSF NfL and GFAP (TAPII NfL r = 0.74, GFAP r = 0.6, all p < 0.0001; Tasso+ NfL r = 0.69, GFAP r = 0.59, all p < 0.0001). Capillary Aβ42/40 and pTau217 did not significantly correlate with CSF measures. Lasso regression identified age and GFAP as significant predictors of AD across capillary and venous samples (Tasso+ AUC = 0.87, TAPII AUC = 0.75, Venous AUC = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Neurodegeneration biomarkers Aβ42/40, NfL, and GFAP in capillary plasma (Tasso+, TAPII) strongly correlated with venous plasma measures. Capillary and venous pTau217 correlated weakly, indicating further assay refinement is needed. Tasso+ collection was less painful and caused less hemolysis compared to TAPII.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13674320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Blood biomarkers are increasingly critical for non-invasive Alzheimer's Disease (AD) diagnostics and research but typically require on-site processing. Remote point-of-care collection methods could enhance biomarker testing in clinical and research settings. We evaluated the safety and accuracy of blood collection via venous blood and two capillary blood collection devices (Tasso+ and TAPII) for measurements of amyloid-beta 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40), phosphorylated-tau-217 (pTau217), neurofilament-light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) from capillary plasma to simultaneously collected venous plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Methods: Patients seen at the Johns Hopkins Center for CSF Disorders (N = 192) underwent diagnostic lumbar punctures and venipuncture. Warming packs were held to the skin for 5 min before collecting capillary blood (via TAPII or Tasso+ device) and numeric pain scores. CSF, venous, and capillary plasma were analyzed using Quanterix SIMOA immunoassays. Statistical analysis included Pearson/Spearman correlations, Lasso regression, and quantitative comparisons using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: 86 TAPII and 126 Tasso+ plasma samples were collected (77 M, 115 F; mean age 61 ± 18.3 years, range 16-91). Tasso+ devices were 90.3% successful in collecting > 50 μL whole blood, and TAPII devices were 86% successful. Mean pain scores were significantly higher in venous than capillary collections (Venous 2.24/10, TAPII 0.73/10, Tasso+ 0.2/10, p < 0.001). Capillary Aβ42/40, NfL, and GFAP strongly correlated with venous plasma analytes (Tasso+: Aβ42/40 r = 0.75, NfL r = 0.91, GFAP r = 0.80, all p < 0.001; TAPII: Aβ42/40 r = 0.74, NfL r = 0.86, GFAP r = 0.84, all p < 0.001). Tasso+ capillary pTau217 weakly correlated with venous (r = 0.23, p = 0.04). Capillary NfL and GFAP correlated modestly with CSF NfL and GFAP (TAPII NfL r = 0.74, GFAP r = 0.6, all p < 0.0001; Tasso+ NfL r = 0.69, GFAP r = 0.59, all p < 0.0001). Capillary Aβ42/40 and pTau217 did not significantly correlate with CSF measures. Lasso regression identified age and GFAP as significant predictors of AD across capillary and venous samples (Tasso+ AUC = 0.87, TAPII AUC = 0.75, Venous AUC = 0.83).

Interpretation: Neurodegeneration biomarkers Aβ42/40, NfL, and GFAP in capillary plasma (Tasso+, TAPII) strongly correlated with venous plasma measures. Capillary and venous pTau217 correlated weakly, indicating further assay refinement is needed. Tasso+ collection was less painful and caused less hemolysis compared to TAPII.

毛细管采血与静脉血浆和脑脊液测定阿尔茨海默病生物标志物。
目的:血液生物标志物在非侵入性阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断和研究中越来越重要,但通常需要现场处理。远程护理点收集方法可以加强临床和研究环境中的生物标志物检测。我们评估了静脉血和两种毛细血管采血装置(Tasso+和TAPII)采集血液的安全性和准确性,用于测量毛细血管血浆中淀粉样蛋白- β42/40比(Aβ42/40)、磷酸化tau-217 (pTau217)、神经丝光(NfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP),同时采集静脉血浆和脑脊液(CSF)。方法:在约翰霍普金斯脑脊液疾病中心就诊的患者(N = 192)进行了诊断性腰椎穿刺和静脉穿刺。在收集毛细血管血(通过TAPII或Tasso+装置)和数值疼痛评分之前,将温热包放在皮肤上5分钟。使用Quanterix SIMOA免疫分析法分析脑脊液、静脉和毛细血管血浆。统计分析包括Pearson/Spearman相关性、Lasso回归和Bland-Altman图的定量比较。结果:共采集TAPII血浆86份,Tasso+血浆126份(77 M, 115 F,平均年龄61±18.3岁,范围16 ~ 91岁)。Tasso+装置采集bbb50 μL全血的成功率为90.3%,TAPII装置采集全血成功率为86%。静脉采集的平均疼痛评分明显高于毛细血管采集(静脉2.24/10,TAPII 0.73/10, Tasso+ 0.2/10, p)解释:毛细血管血浆中神经退行性生物标志物Aβ42/40、NfL和GFAP (Tasso+, TAPII)与静脉血浆测量值密切相关。毛细管和静脉pTau217相关性较弱,表明需要进一步改进检测方法。与TAPII相比,Tasso+收集更少疼痛和引起更少的溶血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书