Linking transect-based field observations with Sentinel-2 indices to characterize post-fire conditions in a Mediterranean Pinus brutia forest

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Salih Malkoçoğlu, Ergün Kahveci
{"title":"Linking transect-based field observations with Sentinel-2 indices to characterize post-fire conditions in a Mediterranean Pinus brutia forest","authors":"Salih Malkoçoğlu,&nbsp;Ergün Kahveci","doi":"10.1007/s10661-026-16023-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The field-level ecological counterparts of post-fire spectral indices remain poorly understood, particularly when surface-cover components are evaluated separately. This study evaluated the relationship between Sentinel-2-based dNBR, RdNBR, and NDVI indices and transect-based ground cover components in a <i>Pinus brutia</i>–dominated Mediterranean forest following the 2025 Köyceğiz-Akköprü fire. Surface conditions were recorded at 1-m intervals along two orthogonal 10-m transects in each of 73 plots, yielding 1601 point observations assigned to seven mutually exclusive surface-cover categories. Regression models showed that each index was associated with different field or environmental predictors. The NDVI model had the highest explanatory power and was positively associated with live cover (adj. <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.439; <i>β</i> = +0.369). The dNBR model was associated primarily with pre-fire tree cover and slope. These results indicate that dNBR corresponds mainly to the pre-fire structural and topographic context, whereas NDVI corresponds to post-fire live cover and early recovery signals. The negative association between RdNBR and needle litter suggests that relative fire severity indices may be sensitive to residual organic-cover components. Spatial robustness analyses accounting for residual spatial dependence retained these principal associations. Consequently, dNBR, RdNBR, and NDVI are not interchangeable indicators representing the same aspect of post-fire surface conditions, but rather indices that complementarily reflect different ecological components. This study demonstrates that transect-based land cover measurements in Sentinel-2-based post-fire assessments provide a practical field-reference approach that improves the ecological interpretation of spectral indices. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"198 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-026-16023-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field-level ecological counterparts of post-fire spectral indices remain poorly understood, particularly when surface-cover components are evaluated separately. This study evaluated the relationship between Sentinel-2-based dNBR, RdNBR, and NDVI indices and transect-based ground cover components in a Pinus brutia–dominated Mediterranean forest following the 2025 Köyceğiz-Akköprü fire. Surface conditions were recorded at 1-m intervals along two orthogonal 10-m transects in each of 73 plots, yielding 1601 point observations assigned to seven mutually exclusive surface-cover categories. Regression models showed that each index was associated with different field or environmental predictors. The NDVI model had the highest explanatory power and was positively associated with live cover (adj. R2 = 0.439; β = +0.369). The dNBR model was associated primarily with pre-fire tree cover and slope. These results indicate that dNBR corresponds mainly to the pre-fire structural and topographic context, whereas NDVI corresponds to post-fire live cover and early recovery signals. The negative association between RdNBR and needle litter suggests that relative fire severity indices may be sensitive to residual organic-cover components. Spatial robustness analyses accounting for residual spatial dependence retained these principal associations. Consequently, dNBR, RdNBR, and NDVI are not interchangeable indicators representing the same aspect of post-fire surface conditions, but rather indices that complementarily reflect different ecological components. This study demonstrates that transect-based land cover measurements in Sentinel-2-based post-fire assessments provide a practical field-reference approach that improves the ecological interpretation of spectral indices.

将基于样带的野外观测与Sentinel-2指数相结合,以表征地中海油松森林的火灾后条件
火灾后光谱指数的野外生态对应物仍然知之甚少,特别是在单独评估地表覆盖成分时。本研究评估了在2025年Köyceğiz-Akköprü火灾后,基于sentinel -2的dNBR、RdNBR和NDVI指数与基于样带的地面覆盖成分之间的关系。在73个样地中,沿两个正交的10米样带每隔1米记录一次地表状况,得到1601个观测点,分为7个相互排斥的地表覆盖类别。回归模型表明,每个指标与不同的领域或环境预测因子相关。NDVI模型的解释力最高,与活盖度呈正相关(R2 = 0.439; β = +0.369)。dNBR模型主要与火灾前树木覆盖和坡度相关。这些结果表明,dNBR主要对应于火灾前的结构和地形背景,而NDVI则对应于火灾后的活盖和早期恢复信号。RdNBR与针叶凋落物呈负相关,表明相对火灾严重程度指数可能对剩余有机覆盖成分敏感。考虑剩余空间依赖性的空间稳健性分析保留了这些主要关联。因此,dNBR、RdNBR和NDVI并不是代表火灾后地表条件同一方面的可互换指标,而是互补反映不同生态成分的指标。该研究表明,在基于sentinel -2的火灾后评估中,基于样带的土地覆盖测量提供了一种实用的野外参考方法,可以改善光谱指数的生态解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书