Machine learning-based uncertainty quantification for energy consumption and driving range estimation in electric cargo vehicles

Q2 Energy
Energy Informatics Pub Date : 2026-07-17 Epub Date: 2026-10-14 DOI:10.1186/s42162-026-00682-1
Mrugank Gandhi, Archana Y. Chaudhari
{"title":"Machine learning-based uncertainty quantification for energy consumption and driving range estimation in electric cargo vehicles","authors":"Mrugank Gandhi,&nbsp;Archana Y. Chaudhari","doi":"10.1186/s42162-026-00682-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The energy consumption estimation and remaining driving range estimation are important aspects of electric vehicles for intelligent transportation systems, battery management systems, and for reducing range anxiety. Typical deterministic models, however, do not account for the uncertainty associated with dynamic driving behaviour, traffic variations, environmental conditions, and battery characteristics, and therefore have limited prediction ability. This study implements a comparative analysis of several uncertainty-aware machine learning models to estimate energy consumption and driving range of EVs using real-world driving data. The developed methods include SVR Residual Bootstrap, RF Variance Estimation, SVR Conformal Prediction, SVR Adaptive Conformal Prediction, LightGBM Quantile Regression, LightGBM Conformal Quantile Regression (CQR), and LightGBM Adaptive Conformal Quantile Regression (ACQR). The models are evaluated using deterministic metrics including RMSE, MAE, R<sup>2</sup>, and uncertainty-specific metrics including PICP and MPIW. The experimental results showed that accuracy of predictions, uncertainty coverage reliability, and interval sharpness were not equally good for the frameworks evaluated, resulting in significant trade-offs. SVR Residual Bootstrap had the best prediction performance in a deterministic prediction with RMSE = 2.358, MAE = 1.742, and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.893. RF Variance and LightGBM CQR had higher uncertainty coverage but with wider intervals, while LightGBM ACQR had better balance between uncertainty coverage reliability and interval efficiency. Among all implemented approaches, the results of the SVR Conformal approach showed consistent and stable uncertainty estimation with reliability of the coverage (PICP = 0.95) and moderate interval width (MPIW = 15), making it suitable for real-world EV applications. The results underscore the significance of incorporating uncertainty quantification in EV prediction systems to ensure reliable and dependable sustainable transportation applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":538,"journal":{"name":"Energy Informatics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s42162-026-00682-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42162-026-00682-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy consumption estimation and remaining driving range estimation are important aspects of electric vehicles for intelligent transportation systems, battery management systems, and for reducing range anxiety. Typical deterministic models, however, do not account for the uncertainty associated with dynamic driving behaviour, traffic variations, environmental conditions, and battery characteristics, and therefore have limited prediction ability. This study implements a comparative analysis of several uncertainty-aware machine learning models to estimate energy consumption and driving range of EVs using real-world driving data. The developed methods include SVR Residual Bootstrap, RF Variance Estimation, SVR Conformal Prediction, SVR Adaptive Conformal Prediction, LightGBM Quantile Regression, LightGBM Conformal Quantile Regression (CQR), and LightGBM Adaptive Conformal Quantile Regression (ACQR). The models are evaluated using deterministic metrics including RMSE, MAE, R2, and uncertainty-specific metrics including PICP and MPIW. The experimental results showed that accuracy of predictions, uncertainty coverage reliability, and interval sharpness were not equally good for the frameworks evaluated, resulting in significant trade-offs. SVR Residual Bootstrap had the best prediction performance in a deterministic prediction with RMSE = 2.358, MAE = 1.742, and R2 = 0.893. RF Variance and LightGBM CQR had higher uncertainty coverage but with wider intervals, while LightGBM ACQR had better balance between uncertainty coverage reliability and interval efficiency. Among all implemented approaches, the results of the SVR Conformal approach showed consistent and stable uncertainty estimation with reliability of the coverage (PICP = 0.95) and moderate interval width (MPIW = 15), making it suitable for real-world EV applications. The results underscore the significance of incorporating uncertainty quantification in EV prediction systems to ensure reliable and dependable sustainable transportation applications.

基于机器学习的电动货车能耗与续驶里程不确定性量化
能源消耗估算和剩余续驶里程估算是电动汽车智能交通系统、电池管理系统和减少续驶里程焦虑的重要方面。然而,典型的确定性模型没有考虑到与动态驾驶行为、交通变化、环境条件和电池特性相关的不确定性,因此预测能力有限。本研究对几种不确定性感知机器学习模型进行了比较分析,以利用真实驾驶数据估计电动汽车的能耗和续驶里程。所开发的方法包括SVR残差Bootstrap、RF方差估计、SVR保形预测、SVR自适应保形预测、LightGBM分位数回归、LightGBM保形分位数回归(CQR)和LightGBM自适应保形分位数回归(ACQR)。使用确定性指标评估模型,包括RMSE、MAE、R2和不确定性指标,包括PICP和MPIW。实验结果表明,对评估的框架来说,预测的准确性、不确定性覆盖的可靠性和区间清晰度并不是同等好的,这导致了重大的权衡。在确定性预测中,SVR残差Bootstrap的预测效果最好,RMSE = 2.358, MAE = 1.742, R2 = 0.893。RF Variance和LightGBM CQR的不确定性覆盖率较高,但区间较宽,而LightGBM ACQR在不确定性覆盖可靠性和区间效率之间有较好的平衡。在所有实现的方法中,SVR保形方法的结果显示出一致和稳定的不确定性估计,其覆盖可靠性(PICP = 0.95)和中等的区间宽度(MPIW = 15),适合实际EV应用。结果强调了在电动汽车预测系统中引入不确定性量化对于确保可靠和可靠的可持续交通应用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Informatics
Energy Informatics Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书