Women’s self-help groups, natural farming, and the gendered politics of agrarian governance in India

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Carly E. Nichols, Nidhi Kumari
{"title":"Women’s self-help groups, natural farming, and the gendered politics of agrarian governance in India","authors":"Carly E. Nichols,&nbsp;Nidhi Kumari","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10997-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent years have seen increased scholarly interest in how to “scale” agroecology through institutional mechanisms, however little research has examined the gendered dynamics of such institutional scaling. This paper attempts to build this research through examining how state agencies and NGOs in India use women’s Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as shared infrastructure for promoting natural farming. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork across two districts in eastern Madhya Pradesh, this paper identifies two interrelated governance dynamics from using women’s institutions as platforms of implementation. First, constrained participation refers to how women are recruited as frontline agents of agricultural change yet lack the household authority, time, and material support necessary to ensure its adoption. Second, redistributed liability describes how when interventions falter, accountability can travel downward through domestic relationships, community reputation, and SHG social networks, settling on the women tasked with delivery rather than institutional actors responsible for intervention design. We situate these findings within feminist scholarship on development and debates on agroecology governance. Overall the paper’s main argument is that SHGs in India increasingly work as infrastructures of state and NGO governance, and that routing natural farming through SHGs has the potential to shift the risks of agricultural transition onto SHG members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10997-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have seen increased scholarly interest in how to “scale” agroecology through institutional mechanisms, however little research has examined the gendered dynamics of such institutional scaling. This paper attempts to build this research through examining how state agencies and NGOs in India use women’s Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as shared infrastructure for promoting natural farming. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork across two districts in eastern Madhya Pradesh, this paper identifies two interrelated governance dynamics from using women’s institutions as platforms of implementation. First, constrained participation refers to how women are recruited as frontline agents of agricultural change yet lack the household authority, time, and material support necessary to ensure its adoption. Second, redistributed liability describes how when interventions falter, accountability can travel downward through domestic relationships, community reputation, and SHG social networks, settling on the women tasked with delivery rather than institutional actors responsible for intervention design. We situate these findings within feminist scholarship on development and debates on agroecology governance. Overall the paper’s main argument is that SHGs in India increasingly work as infrastructures of state and NGO governance, and that routing natural farming through SHGs has the potential to shift the risks of agricultural transition onto SHG members.

妇女自助团体,自然农业,以及印度土地管理的性别政治
近年来,学术界对如何通过制度机制“扩大”农业生态学的兴趣日益浓厚,然而,很少有研究考察这种制度规模的性别动态。本文试图通过检查印度的国家机构和非政府组织如何利用妇女自助团体(SHGs)作为促进自然农业的共享基础设施来建立这项研究。根据中央邦东部两个地区的定性实地调查,本文确定了利用妇女机构作为实施平台的两种相互关联的治理动态。首先,有限的参与是指女性被招募为农业变革的一线推动者,但却缺乏确保其采用所需的家庭权威、时间和物质支持。其次,再分配责任描述了当干预措施出现问题时,责任如何通过家庭关系、社区声誉和SHG社会网络向下传播,将责任集中在负责分娩的妇女身上,而不是负责干预措施设计的机构行动者。我们将这些发现置于关于发展的女权主义奖学金和关于农业生态治理的辩论中。总的来说,这篇论文的主要论点是,印度的SHG越来越多地成为国家和非政府组织治理的基础设施,通过SHG引导自然农业有可能将农业转型的风险转移到SHG成员身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书