{"title":"Women’s self-help groups, natural farming, and the gendered politics of agrarian governance in India","authors":"Carly E. Nichols, Nidhi Kumari","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10997-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent years have seen increased scholarly interest in how to “scale” agroecology through institutional mechanisms, however little research has examined the gendered dynamics of such institutional scaling. This paper attempts to build this research through examining how state agencies and NGOs in India use women’s Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as shared infrastructure for promoting natural farming. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork across two districts in eastern Madhya Pradesh, this paper identifies two interrelated governance dynamics from using women’s institutions as platforms of implementation. First, constrained participation refers to how women are recruited as frontline agents of agricultural change yet lack the household authority, time, and material support necessary to ensure its adoption. Second, redistributed liability describes how when interventions falter, accountability can travel downward through domestic relationships, community reputation, and SHG social networks, settling on the women tasked with delivery rather than institutional actors responsible for intervention design. We situate these findings within feminist scholarship on development and debates on agroecology governance. Overall the paper’s main argument is that SHGs in India increasingly work as infrastructures of state and NGO governance, and that routing natural farming through SHGs has the potential to shift the risks of agricultural transition onto SHG members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10997-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent years have seen increased scholarly interest in how to “scale” agroecology through institutional mechanisms, however little research has examined the gendered dynamics of such institutional scaling. This paper attempts to build this research through examining how state agencies and NGOs in India use women’s Self-Help Groups (SHGs) as shared infrastructure for promoting natural farming. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork across two districts in eastern Madhya Pradesh, this paper identifies two interrelated governance dynamics from using women’s institutions as platforms of implementation. First, constrained participation refers to how women are recruited as frontline agents of agricultural change yet lack the household authority, time, and material support necessary to ensure its adoption. Second, redistributed liability describes how when interventions falter, accountability can travel downward through domestic relationships, community reputation, and SHG social networks, settling on the women tasked with delivery rather than institutional actors responsible for intervention design. We situate these findings within feminist scholarship on development and debates on agroecology governance. Overall the paper’s main argument is that SHGs in India increasingly work as infrastructures of state and NGO governance, and that routing natural farming through SHGs has the potential to shift the risks of agricultural transition onto SHG members.
期刊介绍:
Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems.
To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.