Thirty-five years after Farmer First: embedding farmer participation in national agricultural policy and practice

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Martina Occelli, Jacqueline Ashby, Marvin Gomez, Sally Humphries, Clare M. Mukankusi, Jean Claude Rubyogo, Mamourou Sidibe, David J. Spielman, John Thompson, Eva Weltzien, Hale Ann Tufan
{"title":"Thirty-five years after Farmer First: embedding farmer participation in national agricultural policy and practice","authors":"Martina Occelli,&nbsp;Jacqueline Ashby,&nbsp;Marvin Gomez,&nbsp;Sally Humphries,&nbsp;Clare M. Mukankusi,&nbsp;Jean Claude Rubyogo,&nbsp;Mamourou Sidibe,&nbsp;David J. Spielman,&nbsp;John Thompson,&nbsp;Eva Weltzien,&nbsp;Hale Ann Tufan","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10976-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thirty-five years ago, the <i>Farmer First</i> movement presented a new paradigm for agricultural R&amp;D, making the case for a more prominent role for farmers in the design, development, and dissemination of agricultural technologies and practices. Since then, a diverse range of projects have been implemented with explicit attention to the engagement and participation of farmers and farmer-based organizations. After nearly four decades, it is worth reflecting further on the full extent of this paradigm’s impact on research and innovation policy. Specifically, has the movement led to the institutionalization of meaningful farmer engagement and participation in national policy formulation and implementation? To answer this question, we adopt a case study approach and combine project and public policy document analysis with key informant interviews held with actors in government, research institutions, donor agencies, and farmer organizations. We select three farmer-first-oriented projects in Honduras, Mali, and the eastern Africa region, each of which have had long exposure to the participatory principles we expect to see reflected in the agricultural policies of the country. We document the specific interactions between project actors and the policy space. We then analyze common policy trends across case studies. First, we find that change is often driven by highly motivated individuals who operate with a lack of buy-in from policy-relevant institutions. Second, we observe change when organizations practicing farmer-first approaches partner with more influential organizations, which may not have internalized those principles but have a common interest in the dissemination of technologies and practices. Third, we find that national agricultural policies in the case study countries are not codifying well-established participatory practices. We discuss pathways toward greater farmer participation in light of these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10976-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10976-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirty-five years ago, the Farmer First movement presented a new paradigm for agricultural R&D, making the case for a more prominent role for farmers in the design, development, and dissemination of agricultural technologies and practices. Since then, a diverse range of projects have been implemented with explicit attention to the engagement and participation of farmers and farmer-based organizations. After nearly four decades, it is worth reflecting further on the full extent of this paradigm’s impact on research and innovation policy. Specifically, has the movement led to the institutionalization of meaningful farmer engagement and participation in national policy formulation and implementation? To answer this question, we adopt a case study approach and combine project and public policy document analysis with key informant interviews held with actors in government, research institutions, donor agencies, and farmer organizations. We select three farmer-first-oriented projects in Honduras, Mali, and the eastern Africa region, each of which have had long exposure to the participatory principles we expect to see reflected in the agricultural policies of the country. We document the specific interactions between project actors and the policy space. We then analyze common policy trends across case studies. First, we find that change is often driven by highly motivated individuals who operate with a lack of buy-in from policy-relevant institutions. Second, we observe change when organizations practicing farmer-first approaches partner with more influential organizations, which may not have internalized those principles but have a common interest in the dissemination of technologies and practices. Third, we find that national agricultural policies in the case study countries are not codifying well-established participatory practices. We discuss pathways toward greater farmer participation in light of these findings.

“农民优先”后的35年:将农民参与纳入国家农业政策和实践
35年前,“农民优先”运动为农业研发提供了一个新的范例,使农民在农业技术和实践的设计、开发和传播中发挥更重要的作用。从那时起,实施了各种各样的项目,明确重视农民和农民组织的参与。经过近40年的发展,我们有必要进一步反思这一范式对研究和创新政策的全面影响。具体来说,这场运动是否使农民有意义地参与和参与国家政策的制定和实施制度化?为了回答这个问题,我们采用了案例研究方法,并将项目和公共政策文件分析与对政府、研究机构、捐助机构和农民组织的关键信息提供者的访谈相结合。我们在洪都拉斯、马里和东非地区选择了三个以农民优先为导向的项目,每个项目都长期奉行参与性原则,我们希望看到这些原则反映在该国的农业政策中。我们记录了项目参与者和策略空间之间的特定交互。然后,我们分析跨案例研究的共同政策趋势。首先,我们发现,变革往往是由高度积极的个人推动的,他们在缺乏政策相关机构支持的情况下运作。第二,当实践农民优先方法的组织与更有影响力的组织合作时,我们观察到变化,这些组织可能没有内化这些原则,但在传播技术和实践方面有共同利益。第三,我们发现案例研究国家的国家农业政策并没有将成熟的参与性实践编纂成法律。根据这些发现,我们讨论了提高农民参与的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书