The gender dynamics of crop varietal choices in rural Kenya: navigating risk, diversification, and decision-making

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Brenda Boonabaana, Peruth Naturinda, Carol Waweru, Benjamin Kivuva, Martina Cavicchioli, Berber Kramer
{"title":"The gender dynamics of crop varietal choices in rural Kenya: navigating risk, diversification, and decision-making","authors":"Brenda Boonabaana,&nbsp;Peruth Naturinda,&nbsp;Carol Waweru,&nbsp;Benjamin Kivuva,&nbsp;Martina Cavicchioli,&nbsp;Berber Kramer","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10996-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How do women and men farmers in Kenya situate, form, and pursue varietal choices amidst unequal gender relations, seed markets, and climate variability? Drawing on 67 individual interviews and focus group discussions across five Kenyan counties—Bungoma, Busia, Meru, Tharaka Nithi, and Makueni, we apply a feminist political ecology (FPE) lens to examine women and men smallholder farmers’ varietal choices and use in rural Kenya. We show that varietal choice is neither linear nor a simple shift toward ‘newness’ but rather a gendered, intersectional, and bioculturally embedded process of negotiation by farmers to maintain seed diversity and meet multiple short-term and long-term needs, including consumption, marketability, agroecological adaptation and cultural drivers such as labor demands and culinary values. While production traits were prioritized by both women and men, women also highly valued processing and consumption traits. Men (adults and youth) prioritized market traits such as yield potential and market potential. Varietal availability, trust, price, and agroecological fit shape women and men’s perceptions about a variety, choice and use. Gender and age differences shape varietal awareness, with young men and women’s access to information through digital platforms, while adult women relied on interpersonal and local networks. Adult men used radio and mobile phones. Findings illuminate farmers’ strategic maintenance of varietal portfolios spanning both local landraces and breeding varieties. We conclude that seed policies should integrate local knowledge and gendered realities, availability, and access to preferred varieties. Strengthening farmer-researcher crop technology co-creation through participatory breeding, on-farm seed conservation and multiplication is essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10996-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10996-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do women and men farmers in Kenya situate, form, and pursue varietal choices amidst unequal gender relations, seed markets, and climate variability? Drawing on 67 individual interviews and focus group discussions across five Kenyan counties—Bungoma, Busia, Meru, Tharaka Nithi, and Makueni, we apply a feminist political ecology (FPE) lens to examine women and men smallholder farmers’ varietal choices and use in rural Kenya. We show that varietal choice is neither linear nor a simple shift toward ‘newness’ but rather a gendered, intersectional, and bioculturally embedded process of negotiation by farmers to maintain seed diversity and meet multiple short-term and long-term needs, including consumption, marketability, agroecological adaptation and cultural drivers such as labor demands and culinary values. While production traits were prioritized by both women and men, women also highly valued processing and consumption traits. Men (adults and youth) prioritized market traits such as yield potential and market potential. Varietal availability, trust, price, and agroecological fit shape women and men’s perceptions about a variety, choice and use. Gender and age differences shape varietal awareness, with young men and women’s access to information through digital platforms, while adult women relied on interpersonal and local networks. Adult men used radio and mobile phones. Findings illuminate farmers’ strategic maintenance of varietal portfolios spanning both local landraces and breeding varieties. We conclude that seed policies should integrate local knowledge and gendered realities, availability, and access to preferred varieties. Strengthening farmer-researcher crop technology co-creation through participatory breeding, on-farm seed conservation and multiplication is essential.

肯尼亚农村作物品种选择的性别动态:导航风险、多样化和决策
在不平等的性别关系、种子市场和气候变化中,肯尼亚的女性和男性农民如何定位、形成和追求品种选择?通过对肯尼亚五个县(邦戈马、布西亚、梅鲁、塔拉卡·尼希和马库尼)的67次个人访谈和焦点小组讨论,我们运用女权主义政治生态学(FPE)的视角,考察了肯尼亚农村男女小农的品种选择和使用情况。我们的研究表明,品种选择既不是线性的,也不是向“新颖性”的简单转变,而是农民为保持种子多样性并满足多种短期和长期需求(包括消费、适销性、农业生态适应和劳动力需求和烹饪价值等文化驱动因素)而进行的性别、交叉和生物文化嵌入谈判过程。虽然女性和男性都优先考虑生产特征,但女性也高度重视加工和消费特征。男性(成年人和年轻人)优先考虑产量潜力和市场潜力等市场特征。品种的可得性、信任度、价格和农业生态契合度塑造了女性和男性对品种、选择和使用的看法。性别和年龄差异影响了品种意识,年轻男性和女性通过数字平台获取信息,而成年女性则依赖人际和地方网络。成年男性使用收音机和移动电话。研究结果阐明了农民对品种组合的战略性维护,包括地方品种和育种品种。我们得出结论,种子政策应综合考虑当地知识、性别现实、可获得性和优选品种的可及性。通过参与式育种、农场种子保存和繁殖,加强农民与研究人员作物技术的共同创造是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书