Competitiveness of Sugar Production and Trade in BRICS Countries and Implications for Indian and World Sugar Sector

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Rakesh Kumar Singh, Kauntey Suryavanshi, A. K. Sharma, V. K. Singh, M. K. Tripathi, A. P. Dwivedi
{"title":"Competitiveness of Sugar Production and Trade in BRICS Countries and Implications for Indian and World Sugar Sector","authors":"Rakesh Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Kauntey Suryavanshi,&nbsp;A. K. Sharma,&nbsp;V. K. Singh,&nbsp;M. K. Tripathi,&nbsp;A. P. Dwivedi","doi":"10.1007/s12355-026-01806-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper analyses BRICS sugar production scenario, intra-BRICS sugar trade, and the competitive landscape of sugar trade of each member country. BRICS accounts for 55.44% of world sugar production, 90% of which is produced from sugarcane. Intra-BRICS sugar trade is worth 17.18 billion USD representing 41.18% of world sugar trade. The member nations prefer intra-BRICS sugar imports while they are less dependent on intra-BRICS exports. Intra-BRICS sugar exports as per cent of country’s total sugar exports were quite varied from India and Indonesia (6–8%), China (17%) to Brazil (38%). India, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Iran depend more on intra-BRICS sugar imports, up to 95% of their total quantum compared to South Africa (15%). Many BRICS members are persistently exporting conventional products while a few have diversified their exports. Brazil, Egypt, India, and South Africa have the competitiveness in the export of “sugar, molasses and jaggery” product group, while Iran, Egypt, and South Africa have competitive edge in the export of sugar confectionery. The average tariff levels of all BRICS members are quite varied, high for some members, and biased also towards some countries. Brazil faces the highest, and Ethiopia benefits from the lowest Indian tariff. South Africa and UAE apply the highest tariffs on Brazil products. Though sugar trade facilitating business environment in member countries has improved over the years, India needs to develop a long-term strategy for strengthening intra-BRICS investment and trade relations. India also needs to be proactive for enhancing policy-level cooperation amongst members for diversification of sugar exports and generating more conducive and facilitating intra-BRICS sugar production-cum-trade environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"28 6","pages":"2081 - 2099"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-026-01806-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyses BRICS sugar production scenario, intra-BRICS sugar trade, and the competitive landscape of sugar trade of each member country. BRICS accounts for 55.44% of world sugar production, 90% of which is produced from sugarcane. Intra-BRICS sugar trade is worth 17.18 billion USD representing 41.18% of world sugar trade. The member nations prefer intra-BRICS sugar imports while they are less dependent on intra-BRICS exports. Intra-BRICS sugar exports as per cent of country’s total sugar exports were quite varied from India and Indonesia (6–8%), China (17%) to Brazil (38%). India, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Iran depend more on intra-BRICS sugar imports, up to 95% of their total quantum compared to South Africa (15%). Many BRICS members are persistently exporting conventional products while a few have diversified their exports. Brazil, Egypt, India, and South Africa have the competitiveness in the export of “sugar, molasses and jaggery” product group, while Iran, Egypt, and South Africa have competitive edge in the export of sugar confectionery. The average tariff levels of all BRICS members are quite varied, high for some members, and biased also towards some countries. Brazil faces the highest, and Ethiopia benefits from the lowest Indian tariff. South Africa and UAE apply the highest tariffs on Brazil products. Though sugar trade facilitating business environment in member countries has improved over the years, India needs to develop a long-term strategy for strengthening intra-BRICS investment and trade relations. India also needs to be proactive for enhancing policy-level cooperation amongst members for diversification of sugar exports and generating more conducive and facilitating intra-BRICS sugar production-cum-trade environment.

金砖国家食糖生产和贸易竞争力及其对印度和世界食糖行业的影响
本文分析了金砖国家食糖生产情景、金砖国家内部食糖贸易以及各成员国食糖贸易竞争格局。金砖国家占世界糖产量的55.44%,其中90%来自甘蔗。金砖国家间食糖贸易额达171.8亿美元,占世界食糖贸易额的41.18%。成员国更倾向于金砖国家内部的食糖进口,而对金砖国家内部出口的依赖程度则较低。金砖国家内部食糖出口占国家食糖出口总量的百分比差异很大,从印度和印度尼西亚(6-8%),中国(17%)到巴西(38%)。印度、埃及、埃塞俄比亚和伊朗更依赖金砖国家内部的食糖进口,占其总进口量的95%,而南非(15%)。许多金砖国家坚持出口传统产品,少数国家实现了出口多元化。巴西、埃及、印度、南非在“糖、糖蜜、砂糖”类产品出口上具有竞争力,伊朗、埃及、南非在糖果类产品出口上具有竞争优势。金砖国家的平均关税水平参差不齐,有的成员国关税水平较高,有的国家也存在偏倚。巴西面临最高的关税,埃塞俄比亚则受益于印度最低的关税。南非和阿联酋对巴西产品征收最高关税。尽管近年来成员国的食糖贸易便利化营商环境有所改善,但印度需要制定长期战略,加强金砖国家内部的投资和贸易关系。印度还应积极加强成员国间的政策层面合作,实现食糖出口多样化,为金砖国家内部食糖生产和贸易创造更加有利和便利的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书