Modeling freshwater inflow to a tropical estuary using stochastic and neural-network approaches under contrasting hydroclimatic conditions in Brazil

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Luísa Maria de Souza Viana, Eloá Corrêa Lessa Tostes, Wendel Dias Constantino, Felipe Henrique Rossi Luze, Marcos Sarmet Moreira de Barros Salomão, Taíse Bonfim de Jesus, Carlos Eduardo Veiga de Carvalho
{"title":"Modeling freshwater inflow to a tropical estuary using stochastic and neural-network approaches under contrasting hydroclimatic conditions in Brazil","authors":"Luísa Maria de Souza Viana,&nbsp;Eloá Corrêa Lessa Tostes,&nbsp;Wendel Dias Constantino,&nbsp;Felipe Henrique Rossi Luze,&nbsp;Marcos Sarmet Moreira de Barros Salomão,&nbsp;Taíse Bonfim de Jesus,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo Veiga de Carvalho","doi":"10.1007/s10661-026-16034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Freshwater inflow regulates estuarine circulation, salinity gradients, sediment transport, and biogeochemical fluxes, yet long-term discharge records remain scarce in many tropical coastal basins. We compared linear regression, stochastic time-series models (ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks for reconstructing monthly discharge at the Ituberá gauging station, upstream of the Serinhaém estuary (southern Bahia, Brazil), using records from 1966 to 2019. No model family was uniformly superior across rolling-origin selection and independent validation. Predictor-matched comparisons showed no general advantage of MLPs over linear formulations, and extending calibration through 2011 did not consistently improve post-2012 performance. Mean monthly discharge was approximately 15% lower after 2012, while changes in variance and the general seasonal pattern were not detected and evidence for altered temporal dependence remained inconclusive. One-step reconstructions transferred more consistently to held-out data than recursive and longer-horizon predictions, which showed error accumulation. The reconstructed series provides an upstream freshwater boundary indicator for future estuarine modeling, while ecological consequences require explicit hydrodynamic and biogeochemical simulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"198 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-026-16034-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-026-16034-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freshwater inflow regulates estuarine circulation, salinity gradients, sediment transport, and biogeochemical fluxes, yet long-term discharge records remain scarce in many tropical coastal basins. We compared linear regression, stochastic time-series models (ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks for reconstructing monthly discharge at the Ituberá gauging station, upstream of the Serinhaém estuary (southern Bahia, Brazil), using records from 1966 to 2019. No model family was uniformly superior across rolling-origin selection and independent validation. Predictor-matched comparisons showed no general advantage of MLPs over linear formulations, and extending calibration through 2011 did not consistently improve post-2012 performance. Mean monthly discharge was approximately 15% lower after 2012, while changes in variance and the general seasonal pattern were not detected and evidence for altered temporal dependence remained inconclusive. One-step reconstructions transferred more consistently to held-out data than recursive and longer-horizon predictions, which showed error accumulation. The reconstructed series provides an upstream freshwater boundary indicator for future estuarine modeling, while ecological consequences require explicit hydrodynamic and biogeochemical simulation.

在巴西对比水文气候条件下,使用随机和神经网络方法模拟热带河口的淡水流入
淡水流入调节河口环流、盐度梯度、沉积物运输和生物地球化学通量,但在许多热带沿海盆地,长期的流量记录仍然很少。我们比较了线性回归、随机时间序列模型(ARMA、ARIMA和SARIMA)和多层感知器(MLP)神经网络,利用1966年至2019年的记录,重建了serinhaacim河口上游(巴西巴伊亚州南部)ituber测量站的月流量。在滚动原点选择和独立验证中,没有模型族具有统一的优势。预测匹配比较显示,mlp与线性配方相比没有普遍优势,并且将校准延长至2011年并没有持续改善2012年后的性能。2012年之后,月平均流量下降了约15%,而方差和一般季节模式的变化未被检测到,时间依赖性改变的证据仍不确定。一步重建比递归和长期预测更一致地转移到固定数据上,后者显示了误差积累。重建序列为未来河口模拟提供了上游淡水边界指标,而生态后果需要明确的水动力和生物地球化学模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书