Behavioral characterization of dynamic facial expression perception in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) using naturalistic and synthetic stimuli

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Animal Cognition Pub Date : 2026-10-05 Epub Date: 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1007/s10071-026-02109-6
Ramona Siebert, Nick Taubert, Martin A. Giese, Peter Thier
{"title":"Behavioral characterization of dynamic facial expression perception in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) using naturalistic and synthetic stimuli","authors":"Ramona Siebert,&nbsp;Nick Taubert,&nbsp;Martin A. Giese,&nbsp;Peter Thier","doi":"10.1007/s10071-026-02109-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Facial displays are an important channel of communication for primates, yet it remains unclear based on which criteria monkeys evaluate facial expressions. We trained two rhesus macaques to categorize videos of four facial expression types (neutral, lip-smacking, silent bared-teeth (SBT) and open-mouth threat displays) and then tested generalization to novel individuals and avatars while measuring pupillary responses. The animals were able to categorize facial expressions and generalized their classifications to novel, untrained videos, although performance was not perfect. Misclassifications were not driven solely by visual similarity between expression categories, as demonstrated by a novel automated approach integrating deep learning-based motion tracking with the Macaque Facial Action Coding System to enable objective quantification of facial action units. Instead, open-mouth threats were readily categorized correctly and distinguished from lip-smacking, while also eliciting the strongest arousal responses. By contrast, categorization of SBT displays varied substantially across stimulus identities, influenced by body weight, gaze direction, and coordinated movements of eyebrows and ears. Morphed avatar expressions were categorized according to expression component intensity, demonstrating graded perception. Avatar manipulations revealed that categorization was robust against lack of coherent motion and lack of facial realism beyond a basic level of texture. However, human facial expressions elicited no systematic categorizations or differential arousal. Our findings indicate that conspecific facial expressions were perceived as functionally meaningful, context-dependent social signals shaped by all components of facial behavior and signaler characteristics, rather than fixed, mouth movement-defined categories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-026-02109-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-026-02109-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facial displays are an important channel of communication for primates, yet it remains unclear based on which criteria monkeys evaluate facial expressions. We trained two rhesus macaques to categorize videos of four facial expression types (neutral, lip-smacking, silent bared-teeth (SBT) and open-mouth threat displays) and then tested generalization to novel individuals and avatars while measuring pupillary responses. The animals were able to categorize facial expressions and generalized their classifications to novel, untrained videos, although performance was not perfect. Misclassifications were not driven solely by visual similarity between expression categories, as demonstrated by a novel automated approach integrating deep learning-based motion tracking with the Macaque Facial Action Coding System to enable objective quantification of facial action units. Instead, open-mouth threats were readily categorized correctly and distinguished from lip-smacking, while also eliciting the strongest arousal responses. By contrast, categorization of SBT displays varied substantially across stimulus identities, influenced by body weight, gaze direction, and coordinated movements of eyebrows and ears. Morphed avatar expressions were categorized according to expression component intensity, demonstrating graded perception. Avatar manipulations revealed that categorization was robust against lack of coherent motion and lack of facial realism beyond a basic level of texture. However, human facial expressions elicited no systematic categorizations or differential arousal. Our findings indicate that conspecific facial expressions were perceived as functionally meaningful, context-dependent social signals shaped by all components of facial behavior and signaler characteristics, rather than fixed, mouth movement-defined categories.

自然和合成刺激下恒河猴动态面部表情感知的行为特征
面部表情是灵长类动物交流的重要渠道,但目前尚不清楚猴子评估面部表情的标准。我们训练两只恒河猴对四种面部表情类型的视频(中性、咂嘴、无声的露齿和张口威胁)进行分类,然后在测量瞳孔反应的同时测试对新个体和虚拟形象的泛化。这些动物能够对面部表情进行分类,并将它们的分类推广到新的、未经训练的视频中,尽管表现并不完美。错误分类并不仅仅是由表情类别之间的视觉相似性驱动的,正如一种新的自动化方法所证明的那样,该方法将基于深度学习的运动跟踪与猕猴面部动作编码系统相结合,以实现面部动作单元的客观量化。相反,张开嘴的威胁很容易被正确分类,并与咂嘴区分开来,同时也引发了最强烈的唤醒反应。相比之下,SBT表现的分类在不同的刺激身份下差异很大,受体重、凝视方向和眉毛和耳朵的协调运动的影响。根据表情成分强度对变形头像表情进行分类,呈现分级感知。虚拟角色操作表明,除了基本的纹理之外,对于缺乏连贯运动和缺乏面部真实感的分类是稳健的。然而,人类的面部表情没有引起系统的分类或差异唤醒。我们的研究结果表明,同型面部表情被认为是由面部行为和信号特征的所有组成部分形成的功能上有意义的、依赖于情境的社会信号,而不是固定的、由嘴部运动定义的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书