Formulation, Optimization, and Quality Evaluation of Value-Added Finger Millet–Jaggery Chocolate

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Diksha Choubey, N. C. Shahi, A. K. Verma, U. C. Lohani, Arshi Siddiqui, Ashutosh Tiwari, Sanjay Kumar, Waseem Ahmad, Afzal Hussain, Shikha Pandey
{"title":"Formulation, Optimization, and Quality Evaluation of Value-Added Finger Millet–Jaggery Chocolate","authors":"Diksha Choubey,&nbsp;N. C. Shahi,&nbsp;A. K. Verma,&nbsp;U. C. Lohani,&nbsp;Arshi Siddiqui,&nbsp;Ashutosh Tiwari,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar,&nbsp;Waseem Ahmad,&nbsp;Afzal Hussain,&nbsp;Shikha Pandey","doi":"10.1007/s12355-026-01798-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study was undertaken to develop and optimize a jaggery-based chocolate enriched with sprouted finger millet flour and to assess its nutritional and textural characteristics. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied using Design-Expert software (ver. 11.1.0.1). The independent variables selected were cocoa butter replacement with coconut oil (20–30% w/w), conching time (120–180 min), and sprouted finger millet flour incorporation (20–40% w/w). A total of seventeen experiments were performed, and the responses were modelled through multiple regression analysis. The optimized formulation, exhibiting maximum overall desirability, comprised of 22% (w/w) cocoa butter replacement with coconut oil, 150 min of conching, and a 39% (w/w) incorporation of sprouted finger millet flour. The optimized product contained 5.16% moisture, 2.66% ash, 23.60% crude fat, and 9.87% crude protein. Textural analysis revealed hardness of 305.6 N, adhesiveness of 2.14 N·s, cohesiveness of 0.101, and chewiness of 4.07 N. Sensory evaluation indicated high acceptability, with mouthfeel and overall acceptability scores of 8.12 and 7.80, respectively. Model validation demonstrated no significant differences between predicted and experimental values, confirming the adequacy and reliability of the developed models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"28 6","pages":"1985 - 1998"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-026-01798-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to develop and optimize a jaggery-based chocolate enriched with sprouted finger millet flour and to assess its nutritional and textural characteristics. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied using Design-Expert software (ver. 11.1.0.1). The independent variables selected were cocoa butter replacement with coconut oil (20–30% w/w), conching time (120–180 min), and sprouted finger millet flour incorporation (20–40% w/w). A total of seventeen experiments were performed, and the responses were modelled through multiple regression analysis. The optimized formulation, exhibiting maximum overall desirability, comprised of 22% (w/w) cocoa butter replacement with coconut oil, 150 min of conching, and a 39% (w/w) incorporation of sprouted finger millet flour. The optimized product contained 5.16% moisture, 2.66% ash, 23.60% crude fat, and 9.87% crude protein. Textural analysis revealed hardness of 305.6 N, adhesiveness of 2.14 N·s, cohesiveness of 0.101, and chewiness of 4.07 N. Sensory evaluation indicated high acceptability, with mouthfeel and overall acceptability scores of 8.12 and 7.80, respectively. Model validation demonstrated no significant differences between predicted and experimental values, confirming the adequacy and reliability of the developed models.

高附加值手指米粒jaggery巧克力的配方、优化及质量评价
本研究旨在开发和优化一种富含手指小米粉的jagger巧克力,并评估其营养和质地特征。响应面法(RSM)采用Design-Expert软件(ver.;11.1.0.1)。自变量为椰子油替代可可脂(20-30% w/w)、搅拌时间(120-180 min)、小米粉加入量(20-40% w/w)。共进行了17次实验,并通过多元回归分析对响应进行建模。优化后的配方由22% (w/w)的可可脂代替椰子油,150分钟的海螺搅拌,39% (w/w)的发芽小米粉组成,显示出最大的总体可取性。优化后的产品含水分5.16%,灰分2.66%,粗脂肪23.60%,粗蛋白质9.87%。质地分析显示,其硬度为305.6 N,黏附性为2.14 N·s,黏附性为0.101,咀嚼性为4.07 N,感官评价表明其可接受性较高,口感和总体可接受性得分分别为8.12和7.80。模型验证表明预测值与实验值无显著差异,证实了所建模型的充分性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书