Critical collaging as an AI resistance strategy

Deborah Lupton
{"title":"Critical collaging as an AI resistance strategy","authors":"Deborah Lupton","doi":"10.1007/s43681-026-01446-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academic scholarship and community activism initiatives are beginning to challenge and resist the incursion of commercial generative AI applications into everyday life and alleviate their impacts on people and the planet. This essay discusses using collage as a critical research practice to visualise the language of generative AI and to challenge the generic automated images produced by AI models. With these collages, I am attempting to provoke thought about how linguistic and visual rhetorical devices are used to describe generative AI. By pairing images with words in the collages, I am aiming to surface these meanings and feelings and examine what they reveal about the current moment in which a huge amount of hype but also critical responses to generative AI are circulating in popular culture and social and philosophical inquiry. My intention is not to provide a more ‘realistic’ visual portrayal of generative AI. Rather, it is to use a different, surprising, sometimes mordant or absurd, and more compelling visual language to trouble assumptions, disrupt the reductive stock imagery on which industry and popular culture rely and bring to visual life the rhetoric used in critical analyses of AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-026-01446-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01446-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic scholarship and community activism initiatives are beginning to challenge and resist the incursion of commercial generative AI applications into everyday life and alleviate their impacts on people and the planet. This essay discusses using collage as a critical research practice to visualise the language of generative AI and to challenge the generic automated images produced by AI models. With these collages, I am attempting to provoke thought about how linguistic and visual rhetorical devices are used to describe generative AI. By pairing images with words in the collages, I am aiming to surface these meanings and feelings and examine what they reveal about the current moment in which a huge amount of hype but also critical responses to generative AI are circulating in popular culture and social and philosophical inquiry. My intention is not to provide a more ‘realistic’ visual portrayal of generative AI. Rather, it is to use a different, surprising, sometimes mordant or absurd, and more compelling visual language to trouble assumptions, disrupt the reductive stock imagery on which industry and popular culture rely and bring to visual life the rhetoric used in critical analyses of AI.

关键拼贴作为AI抵抗策略
学术奖学金和社区活动倡议开始挑战和抵制商业生成人工智能应用进入日常生活,并减轻它们对人类和地球的影响。本文讨论了将拼贴作为一种关键的研究实践来可视化生成式人工智能的语言,并挑战人工智能模型生成的通用自动图像。通过这些拼贴画,我试图激发人们对如何使用语言和视觉修辞手段来描述生成式人工智能的思考。通过将拼贴画中的图像与文字配对,我的目标是揭示这些含义和感受,并研究它们对当前时刻的揭示,在这个时刻,大量的炒作以及对生成式人工智能的批判性反应正在流行文化和社会哲学探究中传播。我的目的并不是为生成式AI提供一个更“现实”的视觉写照。相反,它是使用一种不同的、令人惊讶的、有时尖刻或荒谬的、更引人注目的视觉语言来扰乱假设,破坏工业和流行文化所依赖的简化的库存图像,并将人工智能批判性分析中使用的修辞带入视觉生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书