Farmer perceptions of shade and shelter in pastoral sheep systems: co-benefits, constraints and agroforestry adoption in Aotearoa New Zealand

IF 3.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Jorie Knook, Kate Tomlinson, Janet Reid, Elizabeth Elliot Noe, David Scobie, Rene Corner-Thomas
{"title":"Farmer perceptions of shade and shelter in pastoral sheep systems: co-benefits, constraints and agroforestry adoption in Aotearoa New Zealand","authors":"Jorie Knook,&nbsp;Kate Tomlinson,&nbsp;Janet Reid,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elliot Noe,&nbsp;David Scobie,&nbsp;Rene Corner-Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s10457-026-01691-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shade and shelter are considered key components to maintain animal welfare and health in extensive farming systems. In many pastoral agricultural-based countries, such as Ireland, Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, the provision of shade and shelter by trees has decreased significantly over the last decades. To encourage increased availabilty of cover for sheep, a greater understanding of farmer perceptions is needed, including the on-farm realities of implementation. Therefore, this study explores farmer understanding around integrating shade and shelter in farm systems in Aotearoa New Zealand, and underlying beliefs and values driving implementation. This study applies an explorative qualitative research approach, by conducting 21 semi-structured interviews with farmers in the North and South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand. It conducts a thematic analysis to identify what is understood as shade and shelter on farm and what drives integration. It finds that shelter is seen as an important component of the farm system, essential for the survival of lambs, especially during extreme weather events and cold times of the year. Shade, on the other hand, is seen more as a luxury asset, with farmers describing it as a “nice to have”. Additional shade and shelter are rarely provided with a primary focus on improving animal welfare, but instead usually come as a co-benefit of planting for erosion control or carbon sequestration. This study contributes to the literature on farmer decision-making in pastoral systems by demonstrating that shade and shelter are perceived and prioritised differently: shelter as a necessity for lamb survival and profitability; shade as a co-benefit of broader land management objectives. The NZ context provides insights for agroforestry adoption and extension practices in comparable pastoral grazing contexts internationally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"100 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-026-01691-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-026-01691-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shade and shelter are considered key components to maintain animal welfare and health in extensive farming systems. In many pastoral agricultural-based countries, such as Ireland, Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, the provision of shade and shelter by trees has decreased significantly over the last decades. To encourage increased availabilty of cover for sheep, a greater understanding of farmer perceptions is needed, including the on-farm realities of implementation. Therefore, this study explores farmer understanding around integrating shade and shelter in farm systems in Aotearoa New Zealand, and underlying beliefs and values driving implementation. This study applies an explorative qualitative research approach, by conducting 21 semi-structured interviews with farmers in the North and South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand. It conducts a thematic analysis to identify what is understood as shade and shelter on farm and what drives integration. It finds that shelter is seen as an important component of the farm system, essential for the survival of lambs, especially during extreme weather events and cold times of the year. Shade, on the other hand, is seen more as a luxury asset, with farmers describing it as a “nice to have”. Additional shade and shelter are rarely provided with a primary focus on improving animal welfare, but instead usually come as a co-benefit of planting for erosion control or carbon sequestration. This study contributes to the literature on farmer decision-making in pastoral systems by demonstrating that shade and shelter are perceived and prioritised differently: shelter as a necessity for lamb survival and profitability; shade as a co-benefit of broader land management objectives. The NZ context provides insights for agroforestry adoption and extension practices in comparable pastoral grazing contexts internationally.

农民对牧羊系统中树荫和庇护所的看法:共同利益、制约因素和新西兰奥特罗阿农林业采用
在粗放型农业系统中,荫凉和庇护所被认为是维持动物福利和健康的关键组成部分。在许多以农业为基础的牧区国家,如爱尔兰、澳大利亚和新西兰,过去几十年来,树木提供的遮荫和遮蔽物显著减少。为了鼓励增加对羊的保护,需要更好地了解农民的看法,包括农场实施的现实情况。因此,本研究探讨了农民对新西兰奥特罗阿农业系统中遮阳和庇护的理解,以及推动实施的潜在信念和价值观。本研究采用探索性质的研究方法,对新西兰奥特罗阿岛北部和南部的农民进行了21次半结构化访谈。它进行了一个专题分析,以确定什么是农场上的阴影和庇护所,以及是什么推动了整合。研究发现,庇护所被视为农场系统的一个重要组成部分,对羔羊的生存至关重要,特别是在极端天气事件和一年中的寒冷时期。另一方面,遮荫更多地被视为一种奢侈资产,农民将其描述为“拥有很好”。提供额外的树荫和遮蔽物很少主要是为了改善动物福利,而通常是作为控制侵蚀或固碳种植的共同利益。这项研究通过证明人们对荫凉和遮蔽的感知和优先级不同,为牧民系统中农民决策的文献做出了贡献:遮蔽是羊羔生存和盈利的必要条件;遮荫是更广泛的土地管理目标的共同利益。新西兰的背景为国际上可比的牧区放牧背景下的农林业采用和推广实践提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书