Positioning agroforestry within the scientific literature on Vanilla planifolia: a global bibliometric and thematic assessment

IF 3.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Gabriel A. Gómez-Rodríguez, Jorge Omar López-Martínez, Edgar J. González, Pedro A. Macario-Mendoza, Luz María Calvo-Irabien
{"title":"Positioning agroforestry within the scientific literature on Vanilla planifolia: a global bibliometric and thematic assessment","authors":"Gabriel A. Gómez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Jorge Omar López-Martínez,&nbsp;Edgar J. González,&nbsp;Pedro A. Macario-Mendoza,&nbsp;Luz María Calvo-Irabien","doi":"10.1007/s10457-026-01699-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><i>Vanilla</i> <i>planifolia</i> cultivation faces critical sustainability, conservation, and management challenges within tree-based production systems. As a hemiepiphytic climbing orchid, the species depends on arboreal environments, suggesting that agroforestry research should be central to its scientific literature. However, the representation of this agroforestry dimension remains unclear. To assess this structural visibility, we applied a three-level hierarchical thematic classification and bibliometric science mapping to a dataset of 531 publications from Scopus and Web of Science. We identified nine thematic domains; notably, 84.9% of the literature fell within the dominant domains of aroma chemistry, plant biotechnology, genetics, biotic interactions, and physiology, whereas the agroforestry subset represents only 4.9%. Furthermore, while agronomic management studies represented 17.1% of the dataset, most studies adopt a crop-centered or management-oriented perspective rather than integrated agroforestry frameworks. Mexico emerged as the leading country in institutional research within both the global dataset and the agroforestry subset. Overall, research predominantly frames <i>V. planifolia</i> as an industrial product, leaving its ecological and arboreal context underrepresented. These findings reveal a structural mismatch between the tree-dependent biology of the species and the dominant scientific priorities, where agroforestry questions remain marginal. Together, these findings provide an organised perspective on the current agroforestry knowledge base and highlight opportunities for developing more integrated research on the plant-tree-environment relationships underlying <i>V. planifolia</i> cultivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"100 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-026-01699-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vanilla planifolia cultivation faces critical sustainability, conservation, and management challenges within tree-based production systems. As a hemiepiphytic climbing orchid, the species depends on arboreal environments, suggesting that agroforestry research should be central to its scientific literature. However, the representation of this agroforestry dimension remains unclear. To assess this structural visibility, we applied a three-level hierarchical thematic classification and bibliometric science mapping to a dataset of 531 publications from Scopus and Web of Science. We identified nine thematic domains; notably, 84.9% of the literature fell within the dominant domains of aroma chemistry, plant biotechnology, genetics, biotic interactions, and physiology, whereas the agroforestry subset represents only 4.9%. Furthermore, while agronomic management studies represented 17.1% of the dataset, most studies adopt a crop-centered or management-oriented perspective rather than integrated agroforestry frameworks. Mexico emerged as the leading country in institutional research within both the global dataset and the agroforestry subset. Overall, research predominantly frames V. planifolia as an industrial product, leaving its ecological and arboreal context underrepresented. These findings reveal a structural mismatch between the tree-dependent biology of the species and the dominant scientific priorities, where agroforestry questions remain marginal. Together, these findings provide an organised perspective on the current agroforestry knowledge base and highlight opportunities for developing more integrated research on the plant-tree-environment relationships underlying V. planifolia cultivation.

定位农林业在香草planifolia科学文献:全球文献计量学和专题评估
在以树为基础的生产系统中,香草种植面临着关键的可持续性、保护和管理挑战。作为一种半附生攀援兰花,该物种依赖于树栖环境,这表明农林业研究应该是其科学文献的中心。然而,这种农林业方面的代表性仍然不清楚。为了评估这种结构可见性,我们对来自Scopus和Web of science的531篇出版物的数据集应用了三级层次主题分类和文献计量科学映射。我们确定了九个主题领域;值得注意的是,84.9%的文献属于香气化学,植物生物技术,遗传学,生物相互作用和生理学的主导领域,而农林业子集仅占4.9%。此外,虽然农艺管理研究占数据集的17.1%,但大多数研究采用以作物为中心或以管理为导向的视角,而不是综合农林业框架。墨西哥在全球数据集和农林业子集的机构研究方面都处于领先地位。总体而言,研究主要将平叶兰作为一种工业产品,而没有充分代表其生态和树木环境。这些发现揭示了该物种依赖树木的生物学与主要科学优先事项之间的结构不匹配,其中农林业问题仍然处于边缘地位。总之,这些发现为当前的农林业知识库提供了一个有组织的视角,并突出了开展更综合的植物-树-环境关系研究的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书