{"title":"Finite element analysis of the response of DP800 steel sheet in a new laboratory forming test","authors":"Rahul Rakshit, Benoit Revil-Baudard, Oana Cazacu","doi":"10.1007/s12289-026-02092-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Owing to the good formability combined with low yield-to-ultimate tensile strength ratio, DP800 steel is widely used in the automotive industry. For process optimization and analysis of the feasibility and resulting part quality, it is essential to use a suitable constitutive model. To assess the predictive capabilities of models for forming applications, very recently a benchmark focusing on simulation of a new laboratory forming test, called material under control (MUC) was launched. In this paper, we show that an elastoplastic model with yielding described by the 3-D orthotropic yield criteria of Hill48 [1] and Cazacu [2], and isotropic hardening accurately predict the observed plastic anisotropy of the DP800 steel. The predictive capabilities of these models are demonstrated through comparisons between simulation results and experimental data in uniaxial tension and MUC-Tests, including punch force-displacement curves and surface strain distributions for all specimen geometries. Furthermore, the effect of specimen orientation on the strain path experienced by the material during a MUC test was investigated using Cazacu [2] criterion. The results presented suggest that the use of 3-D orthotropic yield criteria and isotropic hardening may provide reliable virtual assessments of DP800 steel for forming operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Material Forming","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Material Forming","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12289-026-02092-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Owing to the good formability combined with low yield-to-ultimate tensile strength ratio, DP800 steel is widely used in the automotive industry. For process optimization and analysis of the feasibility and resulting part quality, it is essential to use a suitable constitutive model. To assess the predictive capabilities of models for forming applications, very recently a benchmark focusing on simulation of a new laboratory forming test, called material under control (MUC) was launched. In this paper, we show that an elastoplastic model with yielding described by the 3-D orthotropic yield criteria of Hill48 [1] and Cazacu [2], and isotropic hardening accurately predict the observed plastic anisotropy of the DP800 steel. The predictive capabilities of these models are demonstrated through comparisons between simulation results and experimental data in uniaxial tension and MUC-Tests, including punch force-displacement curves and surface strain distributions for all specimen geometries. Furthermore, the effect of specimen orientation on the strain path experienced by the material during a MUC test was investigated using Cazacu [2] criterion. The results presented suggest that the use of 3-D orthotropic yield criteria and isotropic hardening may provide reliable virtual assessments of DP800 steel for forming operations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes and disseminates original research in the field of material forming. The research should constitute major achievements in the understanding, modeling or simulation of material forming processes. In this respect ‘forming’ implies a deliberate deformation of material.
The journal establishes a platform of communication between engineers and scientists, covering all forming processes, including sheet forming, bulk forming, powder forming, forming in near-melt conditions (injection moulding, thixoforming, film blowing etc.), micro-forming, hydro-forming, thermo-forming, incremental forming etc. Other manufacturing technologies like machining and cutting can be included if the focus of the work is on plastic deformations.
All materials (metals, ceramics, polymers, composites, glass, wood, fibre reinforced materials, materials in food processing, biomaterials, nano-materials, shape memory alloys etc.) and approaches (micro-macro modelling, thermo-mechanical modelling, numerical simulation including new and advanced numerical strategies, experimental analysis, inverse analysis, model identification, optimization, design and control of forming tools and machines, wear and friction, mechanical behavior and formability of materials etc.) are concerned.