Collaborative seed system partnerships in Africa: debates and considerations for transformative impact

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Helena Shilomboleni, Matthew A. Schnurr, Melanie Connor
{"title":"Collaborative seed system partnerships in Africa: debates and considerations for transformative impact","authors":"Helena Shilomboleni,&nbsp;Matthew A. Schnurr,&nbsp;Melanie Connor","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10992-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>International agricultural initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa have evolved over time to develop and disseminate crop varieties that deliver performance on yield, nutrition and climate resilience. Many of these activities are part of the New Green Revolution for Africa (GR4A), which promotes demand-oriented programs that pay attention to women and marginalized households that have not previously benefited from earlier Green Revolution initiatives. At the same time, critics view the GR4A as enabling the commercial formalization of seed systems in ways that marginalize smallholder farmers and dispose of their agency in agricultural decision-making. This paper presents research findings from an international collaborative rice partnership in Kenya to showcase the nature and impact of its activities. The study findings demonstrate how the promotion of <i>Komboka</i> rice variety (IR05N221) garnered success through concerted efforts to foster horizontal partnerships, based on joint decision-making and mutual respect with a diversity of key national actors, including farmer organizations. The research also found that <i>Komboka</i> is appreciated by women for household consumption in Kirinyaga and presents a viable alternative in Tana River where it appears to be the only rice variety that is adapted to local agro-ecological conditions. Yet, there remain gaps in realizing wider benefits from promising crop technologies such as <i>Komboka</i>, particularly for women rice farmers. Addressing some of these constraints would require fostering more context-sensitive and gender-responsive approaches that broaden perspectives around seed systems’ performance, to incorporate indicators, such as capacity of seed technologies to reach, benefit and empower different groups of women and men farmers when determining the success of seed system interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-026-10992-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International agricultural initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa have evolved over time to develop and disseminate crop varieties that deliver performance on yield, nutrition and climate resilience. Many of these activities are part of the New Green Revolution for Africa (GR4A), which promotes demand-oriented programs that pay attention to women and marginalized households that have not previously benefited from earlier Green Revolution initiatives. At the same time, critics view the GR4A as enabling the commercial formalization of seed systems in ways that marginalize smallholder farmers and dispose of their agency in agricultural decision-making. This paper presents research findings from an international collaborative rice partnership in Kenya to showcase the nature and impact of its activities. The study findings demonstrate how the promotion of Komboka rice variety (IR05N221) garnered success through concerted efforts to foster horizontal partnerships, based on joint decision-making and mutual respect with a diversity of key national actors, including farmer organizations. The research also found that Komboka is appreciated by women for household consumption in Kirinyaga and presents a viable alternative in Tana River where it appears to be the only rice variety that is adapted to local agro-ecological conditions. Yet, there remain gaps in realizing wider benefits from promising crop technologies such as Komboka, particularly for women rice farmers. Addressing some of these constraints would require fostering more context-sensitive and gender-responsive approaches that broaden perspectives around seed systems’ performance, to incorporate indicators, such as capacity of seed technologies to reach, benefit and empower different groups of women and men farmers when determining the success of seed system interventions.

非洲种子系统合作伙伴关系:变革影响的辩论和考虑
随着时间的推移,撒哈拉以南非洲的国际农业倡议不断发展,以开发和推广在产量、营养和气候适应能力方面表现出色的作物品种。其中许多活动是“非洲新绿色革命”(GR4A)的一部分,该计划促进以需求为导向的项目,关注妇女和边缘化家庭,这些家庭以前没有从早期的绿色革命倡议中受益。与此同时,批评者认为GR4A使种子系统的商业正规化,使小农边缘化,并剥夺了他们在农业决策中的代理权。本文介绍了肯尼亚国际稻米合作伙伴关系的研究成果,以展示其活动的性质和影响。研究结果表明,通过与包括农民组织在内的各种主要国家行为体共同决策和相互尊重,共同努力促进横向伙伴关系,Komboka水稻品种(IR05N221)的推广取得了成功。研究还发现,Komboka深受Kirinyaga妇女家庭消费的喜爱,并为Tana River提供了可行的替代方案,因为它似乎是唯一适应当地农业生态条件的水稻品种。然而,在从Komboka等有前途的作物技术中获得更广泛的利益方面,特别是对女性稻农来说,仍然存在差距。要解决其中的一些制约因素,就需要培养对环境更敏感、对性别更敏感的方法,拓宽对种子系统绩效的看法,在确定种子系统干预措施是否成功时,纳入诸如种子技术覆盖、惠及和增强不同男女农民群体的能力等指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书