Understanding histotripsy ablation safety: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical adverse events.

CVIR oncology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-12 DOI:10.1007/s44343-026-00062-2
Madeline I Foo, Cynthia Uzoukwu, Robert Morhard, Katrina L Falk, Bradford J Wood, Gregory Frey, Timothy J Ziemlewicz, Eli Vlaisavljevich, Beau B Toskich, Alissa Hendricks-Wenger
{"title":"Understanding histotripsy ablation safety: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical adverse events.","authors":"Madeline I Foo, Cynthia Uzoukwu, Robert Morhard, Katrina L Falk, Bradford J Wood, Gregory Frey, Timothy J Ziemlewicz, Eli Vlaisavljevich, Beau B Toskich, Alissa Hendricks-Wenger","doi":"10.1007/s44343-026-00062-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Histotripsy is the first cavitation-based ablation modality. Given limited clinical experience, synthesis of pre-clinical and early clinical data is essential to guide safe adoption. A PubMed and SCOPUS search was performed focused on pre-clinical and clinical adverse events (AEs) from Histotripsy ablation of parenchymal tissues in vivo (<i>n</i> = 141 total studies, <i>n</i> = 27 clinical reports). Early data suggest an acceptable acute safety profile in select settings; however, reports of serious AEs including pre-clinical bowel perforations, clinical acute kidney injuries, clinical vascular injuries and thromboses, and a clinical case report of hyperprogression raise caution. These highlight the need for proper technique, understanding of mechanism nuances, and longer-term follow-up to assess effects. Recognition of mechanism-specific AEs provides a framework to guide future assessments and safer adoption of Histotripsy. <b>Level of Evidence</b> No level of evidence (review).</p>","PeriodicalId":521157,"journal":{"name":"CVIR oncology","volume":"2 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44343-026-00062-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Histotripsy is the first cavitation-based ablation modality. Given limited clinical experience, synthesis of pre-clinical and early clinical data is essential to guide safe adoption. A PubMed and SCOPUS search was performed focused on pre-clinical and clinical adverse events (AEs) from Histotripsy ablation of parenchymal tissues in vivo (n = 141 total studies, n = 27 clinical reports). Early data suggest an acceptable acute safety profile in select settings; however, reports of serious AEs including pre-clinical bowel perforations, clinical acute kidney injuries, clinical vascular injuries and thromboses, and a clinical case report of hyperprogression raise caution. These highlight the need for proper technique, understanding of mechanism nuances, and longer-term follow-up to assess effects. Recognition of mechanism-specific AEs provides a framework to guide future assessments and safer adoption of Histotripsy. Level of Evidence No level of evidence (review).

了解组织学消融安全性:临床前和临床不良事件的系统回顾。
组织造影是第一种以空腔为基础的消融方式。鉴于临床经验有限,综合临床前和早期临床数据对于指导安全采用至关重要。PubMed和SCOPUS检索集中于临床前和临床不良事件(ae)的组织学消融在体内(n = 141个研究,n = 27个临床报告)。早期数据表明,在某些情况下,急性安全性是可以接受的;然而,严重ae的报告,包括临床前肠穿孔、临床急性肾损伤、临床血管损伤和血栓形成,以及临床病例报告的超进展引起了警惕。这些突出表明需要适当的技术,了解机制的细微差别,并进行长期随访以评估效果。识别特定机制的ae为指导未来的评估和更安全地采用Histotripsy提供了一个框架。证据水平无证据水平(审查)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书