The Participant Voice: Insights into Improving Research Engagement and Retention Across a Multidisciplinary Research Center.

IF 1.1
Elicia Azua, Austin Drake, Gregory Giordano, Cinnamon Bidwell, Angela Bryan, Renée Martin-Willett
{"title":"The Participant Voice: Insights into Improving Research Engagement and Retention Across a Multidisciplinary Research Center.","authors":"Elicia Azua, Austin Drake, Gregory Giordano, Cinnamon Bidwell, Angela Bryan, Renée Martin-Willett","doi":"10.1177/15562646261488472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participant recruitment and retention remain significant research challenges with implications for scientific validity, fair participant selection, and social value. While recruitment strategies are well-studied, participant feedback, a form of community engagement encouraged in research ethics guidance (e.g., CIOMS, 2016), is less often used to improve participant experiences and retention. This pilot study surveyed 25 former participants (20 completers, 5 non-completers) from four prior trials at a human health research center towards developing an online participant feedback survey to use across the entire center. Phone interviews were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Respondents reported mostly positive experiences with the mobile lab and staff. Participation motivations included altruism, curiosity, compensation, and therapeutic potential. Non-completers cited inconvenience. Findings demonstrate the value of participant feedback and informed the development of an online, center-wide feedback tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"15562646261488472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646261488472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participant recruitment and retention remain significant research challenges with implications for scientific validity, fair participant selection, and social value. While recruitment strategies are well-studied, participant feedback, a form of community engagement encouraged in research ethics guidance (e.g., CIOMS, 2016), is less often used to improve participant experiences and retention. This pilot study surveyed 25 former participants (20 completers, 5 non-completers) from four prior trials at a human health research center towards developing an online participant feedback survey to use across the entire center. Phone interviews were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Respondents reported mostly positive experiences with the mobile lab and staff. Participation motivations included altruism, curiosity, compensation, and therapeutic potential. Non-completers cited inconvenience. Findings demonstrate the value of participant feedback and informed the development of an online, center-wide feedback tool.

参与者的声音:提高多学科研究中心的研究参与度和保留率的见解。
参与者的招募和保留仍然是重大的研究挑战,对科学有效性,公平参与者选择和社会价值的影响。虽然招聘策略得到了充分的研究,但参与者反馈,一种在研究伦理指导中鼓励的社区参与形式(例如,CIOMS, 2016),很少用于改善参与者体验和保留。本试点研究调查了25名前参与者(20名完成者,5名未完成者),他们来自于人类健康研究中心先前的四项试验,旨在开发一项在线参与者反馈调查,用于整个中心。采用解释现象学分析(IPA)对电话访谈进行分析。受访者大多报告了与移动实验室和工作人员的积极体验。参与动机包括利他主义、好奇心、补偿和治疗潜力。未完成的人表示不便。调查结果证明了参与者反馈的价值,并为在线、全中心范围的反馈工具的开发提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书