Complementary Diagnostic Value of ZEB1 and CK7 in Renal Oncocytoma and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.

IF 1.2
Jelena Filipović, Ivan Soldatović, Maja Životić, Duško Dunđerović, Jovan Jevtić, Gorana Nikolić, Jadranka M Vukajlović, Sanja Radojević-Škodrić
{"title":"Complementary Diagnostic Value of ZEB1 and CK7 in Renal Oncocytoma and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Jelena Filipović, Ivan Soldatović, Maja Životić, Duško Dunđerović, Jovan Jevtić, Gorana Nikolić, Jadranka M Vukajlović, Sanja Radojević-Škodrić","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal oncocytoma (RO) is a benign renal epithelial tumor that may closely mimic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), particularly in limited biopsy specimens. In addition, the expanding spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms further complicates the differential diagnosis. This study included 251 renal epithelial tumors, of which 250 were included in statistical analyses. The cohort comprised RO, chRCC, papillary RCC, clear cell RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, and a single case of eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT). Tissue microarrays were constructed from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, and immunohistochemical expression of ZEB1, CK7, CD117, AMACR, CD10, GATA3, SDHB, Cathepsin K, and FH was assessed using H-score analysis. Statistical evaluation included 1-way ANOVA, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and binary logistic regression. RO demonstrated significantly higher ZEB1 expression compared with all other tumor subtypes (P<0.001), while ZEB1 expression was absent in chRCC. The single EVT case, excluded from statistical analysis, also showed no ZEB1 expression. In contrast, CK7 expression was highest in chRCC and minimal in RO. ROC analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for both markers (ZEB1 AUC=0.941; CK7 AUC=0.945), and combined analysis showed strong discriminatory power, with an overall classification accuracy of 95.5%. ZEB1 represents a promising complementary marker in the differential diagnosis of RO and chRCC. In combination with CK7, it provides a simple and practical immunohistochemical approach that may improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly in limited biopsy specimens. Further validation across the expanding spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renal oncocytoma (RO) is a benign renal epithelial tumor that may closely mimic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), particularly in limited biopsy specimens. In addition, the expanding spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms further complicates the differential diagnosis. This study included 251 renal epithelial tumors, of which 250 were included in statistical analyses. The cohort comprised RO, chRCC, papillary RCC, clear cell RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, and a single case of eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT). Tissue microarrays were constructed from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, and immunohistochemical expression of ZEB1, CK7, CD117, AMACR, CD10, GATA3, SDHB, Cathepsin K, and FH was assessed using H-score analysis. Statistical evaluation included 1-way ANOVA, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and binary logistic regression. RO demonstrated significantly higher ZEB1 expression compared with all other tumor subtypes (P<0.001), while ZEB1 expression was absent in chRCC. The single EVT case, excluded from statistical analysis, also showed no ZEB1 expression. In contrast, CK7 expression was highest in chRCC and minimal in RO. ROC analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for both markers (ZEB1 AUC=0.941; CK7 AUC=0.945), and combined analysis showed strong discriminatory power, with an overall classification accuracy of 95.5%. ZEB1 represents a promising complementary marker in the differential diagnosis of RO and chRCC. In combination with CK7, it provides a simple and practical immunohistochemical approach that may improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly in limited biopsy specimens. Further validation across the expanding spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms is warranted.

ZEB1和CK7在肾嗜瘤细胞瘤和嫌色性肾细胞癌中的补充诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书