Oliceridine for acute pain management: pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, and future perspectives: a narrative review.

IF 3.6
Min Kyoung Kim, Hyun Kang
{"title":"Oliceridine for acute pain management: pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, and future perspectives: a narrative review.","authors":"Min Kyoung Kim, Hyun Kang","doi":"10.17085/apm.26619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioids are a cornerstone in the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain; however, their clinical utility is limited by well-recognized challenges, including respiratory depression, gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, and the potential for misuse and abuse. Oliceridine is a novel μ-opioid receptor agonist with G-protein-biased signaling and reduced β-arrestin recruitment. It exhibits potent analgesic effects while potentially reducing opioid-related adverse events. In preclinical investigations, oliceridine was associated with lower rates of GI dysfunction and respiratory depression than morphine. In the phase III clinical trials APOLLO-1 and APOLLO-2, certain oliceridine regimens produced rapid and effective analgesia comparable to that of morphine, with lower incidences of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory events. However, current evidence has not demonstrated a clinically meaningful overall advantage compared to conventional opioids. In addition, a clinically meaningful reduction in abuse liability relative to conventional opioids has not been established, underscoring the complexity of opioid reward mechanisms. This narrative review examines the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and ongoing controversies surrounding oliceridine and evaluates its potential role in perioperative pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.26619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opioids are a cornerstone in the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain; however, their clinical utility is limited by well-recognized challenges, including respiratory depression, gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, and the potential for misuse and abuse. Oliceridine is a novel μ-opioid receptor agonist with G-protein-biased signaling and reduced β-arrestin recruitment. It exhibits potent analgesic effects while potentially reducing opioid-related adverse events. In preclinical investigations, oliceridine was associated with lower rates of GI dysfunction and respiratory depression than morphine. In the phase III clinical trials APOLLO-1 and APOLLO-2, certain oliceridine regimens produced rapid and effective analgesia comparable to that of morphine, with lower incidences of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory events. However, current evidence has not demonstrated a clinically meaningful overall advantage compared to conventional opioids. In addition, a clinically meaningful reduction in abuse liability relative to conventional opioids has not been established, underscoring the complexity of opioid reward mechanisms. This narrative review examines the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and ongoing controversies surrounding oliceridine and evaluates its potential role in perioperative pain management.

橄榄碱治疗急性疼痛:药理学、临床疗效、安全性和未来展望:叙述性回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书