Transitioning from Clinical Trial to Clinical Practice for Long-Term Lecanemab Treatment in Early Alzheimer's Disease: Perspectives from a Cohort Study from the Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Center.

IF 1.9
David Watson, Michael G Neam, Mark Stafford, Cynthia Bouchard, Venessa Ranney, Sydney Werner
{"title":"Transitioning from Clinical Trial to Clinical Practice for Long-Term Lecanemab Treatment in Early Alzheimer's Disease: Perspectives from a Cohort Study from the Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Center.","authors":"David Watson, Michael G Neam, Mark Stafford, Cynthia Bouchard, Venessa Ranney, Sydney Werner","doi":"10.2174/0115672050525938260923072703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/background: </strong>Lecanemab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, significantly reduces amyloid markers and slows clinical decline in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. We assessed our single-center experience with lecanemab, including evaluating efficacy and safety data as well as patient-reported outcomes of individuals from our single center treated with intravenous or subcutaneous lecanemab.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, nested cohort study of early AD subjects on lecanemab (intravenous or subcutaneous) at our center. Participants had been initiated on lecanemab therapy as part of lecanemab Study 201 or Clarity AD, and then continued lecanemab treatment in our center. Data collection included patient demographic characteristics, efficacy (eg, CDR-SB), safety, and patient-reported outcomes from surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At our center, 136 people were randomized to receive either lecanemab or placebo in either lecanemab Study 201 (lecanemab:53; placebo:16) or Clarity AD (lecanemab:37; placebo:30). Patients receiving lecanemab were more likely to have higher rates of stable or improved disease across efficacy assessments relative to placebo. There were no new long-term safety signals, and the most common adverse events for lecanemab patients were infusion-related reactions (36.2%), ARIA-H (25.9%), and ARIA-E (13.8%). Survey responses demonstrated high satisfaction with the subcutaneous lecanemab administration, including with treatment satisfaction (97%) and convenience (97%). All patients preferred subcutaneous over IV dosing, citing quickness, ease, and comfort.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our single-center experience with long-term lecanemab treatment was similar to that observed in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subcutaneous lecanemab formulation was highly preferred by patients and care partners, with feedback highlighting reduced treatment burden and strong acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050525938260923072703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/background: Lecanemab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, significantly reduces amyloid markers and slows clinical decline in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. We assessed our single-center experience with lecanemab, including evaluating efficacy and safety data as well as patient-reported outcomes of individuals from our single center treated with intravenous or subcutaneous lecanemab.

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center, nested cohort study of early AD subjects on lecanemab (intravenous or subcutaneous) at our center. Participants had been initiated on lecanemab therapy as part of lecanemab Study 201 or Clarity AD, and then continued lecanemab treatment in our center. Data collection included patient demographic characteristics, efficacy (eg, CDR-SB), safety, and patient-reported outcomes from surveys.

Results: At our center, 136 people were randomized to receive either lecanemab or placebo in either lecanemab Study 201 (lecanemab:53; placebo:16) or Clarity AD (lecanemab:37; placebo:30). Patients receiving lecanemab were more likely to have higher rates of stable or improved disease across efficacy assessments relative to placebo. There were no new long-term safety signals, and the most common adverse events for lecanemab patients were infusion-related reactions (36.2%), ARIA-H (25.9%), and ARIA-E (13.8%). Survey responses demonstrated high satisfaction with the subcutaneous lecanemab administration, including with treatment satisfaction (97%) and convenience (97%). All patients preferred subcutaneous over IV dosing, citing quickness, ease, and comfort.

Discussion: Our single-center experience with long-term lecanemab treatment was similar to that observed in clinical trials.

Conclusion: The subcutaneous lecanemab formulation was highly preferred by patients and care partners, with feedback highlighting reduced treatment burden and strong acceptability.

从早期阿尔茨海默病的临床试验过渡到临床实践:来自阿尔茨海默病研究和治疗中心的一项队列研究的观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书