[Composition of Patient Radiation Dose in Woven EndoBridge Embolization: Comparison with Stent-assisted Coiling].

Daiki Horita, Takayuki Nomura, Hiroaki Neki, Satoshi Goshima
{"title":"[Composition of Patient Radiation Dose in Woven EndoBridge Embolization: Comparison with Stent-assisted Coiling].","authors":"Daiki Horita, Takayuki Nomura, Hiroaki Neki, Satoshi Goshima","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.26-1687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the composition of patient radiation dose in Woven EndoBridge embolization (WEB) and to compare it with stent-assisted coiling (SAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients in the WEB group and 15 patients in the SAC group were retrospectively analyzed. Total air kerma at the reference point (K<sub>a,r</sub>), fluoroscopy air kerma (Fl-K<sub>a,r</sub>), stationary air kerma (St-K<sub>a,r</sub>), rotational air kerma (Ro-K<sub>a,r</sub>), air kerma-area product (P<sub>KA</sub>), fluoroscopy time, number of acquisitions, procedure time, and peak skin dose (PSD) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fl-K<sub>a,r</sub>, fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and PSD were significantly lower in the WEB group than in the SAC group. In contrast, Ro-K<sub>a,r</sub> was higher in the WEB group. The proportion of Ro-K<sub>a,r</sub> to K<sub>a,r</sub> was 46% in the WEB group and 26% in the SAC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with SAC, WEB was associated with lower Fl-K<sub>a,r</sub> and shorter procedure time, whereas the contribution of Ro-K<sub>a,r</sub> was greater. Therefore, radiation dose management in WEB should not rely solely on K<sub>a,r</sub>; rather, it is important to understand each dose component individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"82 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.26-1687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to clarify the composition of patient radiation dose in Woven EndoBridge embolization (WEB) and to compare it with stent-assisted coiling (SAC).

Methods: Fifteen patients in the WEB group and 15 patients in the SAC group were retrospectively analyzed. Total air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r), fluoroscopy air kerma (Fl-Ka,r), stationary air kerma (St-Ka,r), rotational air kerma (Ro-Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), fluoroscopy time, number of acquisitions, procedure time, and peak skin dose (PSD) were compared between the two groups.

Results: Fl-Ka,r, fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and PSD were significantly lower in the WEB group than in the SAC group. In contrast, Ro-Ka,r was higher in the WEB group. The proportion of Ro-Ka,r to Ka,r was 46% in the WEB group and 26% in the SAC group.

Conclusion: Compared with SAC, WEB was associated with lower Fl-Ka,r and shorter procedure time, whereas the contribution of Ro-Ka,r was greater. Therefore, radiation dose management in WEB should not rely solely on Ka,r; rather, it is important to understand each dose component individually.

[编织桥内栓塞患者辐射剂量组成:与支架辅助盘绕的比较]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书