Point-of-care ultrasound in German general practice: a qualitative study of opportunities and barriers.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mareike Ledigen, Anja Wollny, Christin Löffler, Til Uebel, Emil C Reisinger, Gregor Feldmeier
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound in German general practice: a qualitative study of opportunities and barriers.","authors":"Mareike Ledigen, Anja Wollny, Christin Löffler, Til Uebel, Emil C Reisinger, Gregor Feldmeier","doi":"10.1186/s12875-026-03585-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International studies show that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used in primary care settings and can improve diagnostic decision-making. Particularly in the field of general practice, which is characterised by a lower prevalence of severe diseases, the use of POCUS may facilitate patient history-taking and diagnosis in a more targeted and efficient manner. This study aims to investigate how German general practitioners (GPs) perceive the clinical benefits, barriers, and implementation of conventional ultrasound use to date, as well as the benefit, barriers, and implementation requirements of POCUS in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and June 2023, two focus groups (FGs) were held at each of two locations (in Bavaria and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) as part of general practice quality circles. Using a convenience sample, each of the four FGs included between five and eight GPs. Semi-structured FGs were transcribed and anonymised. Using Mayring's inductive content analysis method, two researchers analysed the FGs. The aim was to develop and identify new hypotheses and unexpected themes shedding light on both perspectives regarding the practical benefit and structural challenges of conventional ultrasound, as well as the potential of and barriers to the use of POCUS in general practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the participants' perspective, ultrasound has proven to be extremely relevant in everyday general practice. However, existing reimbursement frameworks and training requirements were perceived as significant barriers. The participants considered the implementation of POCUS in primary care as an opportunity to lower these barriers, improve diagnostic processes, and strengthen GPs' skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings make it clear that the use of ultrasound currently depends largely on the individual commitment of GPs - in terms of the time involved and the financial resources required. However, it is also clear that POCUS could offer the potential to improve the conditions for the use of ultrasound in GP practices. In this way, the introduction of POCUS may improve diagnostic workflows and their accessibility in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13670600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03585-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International studies show that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used in primary care settings and can improve diagnostic decision-making. Particularly in the field of general practice, which is characterised by a lower prevalence of severe diseases, the use of POCUS may facilitate patient history-taking and diagnosis in a more targeted and efficient manner. This study aims to investigate how German general practitioners (GPs) perceive the clinical benefits, barriers, and implementation of conventional ultrasound use to date, as well as the benefit, barriers, and implementation requirements of POCUS in primary care.

Methods: Between March and June 2023, two focus groups (FGs) were held at each of two locations (in Bavaria and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) as part of general practice quality circles. Using a convenience sample, each of the four FGs included between five and eight GPs. Semi-structured FGs were transcribed and anonymised. Using Mayring's inductive content analysis method, two researchers analysed the FGs. The aim was to develop and identify new hypotheses and unexpected themes shedding light on both perspectives regarding the practical benefit and structural challenges of conventional ultrasound, as well as the potential of and barriers to the use of POCUS in general practice.

Results: From the participants' perspective, ultrasound has proven to be extremely relevant in everyday general practice. However, existing reimbursement frameworks and training requirements were perceived as significant barriers. The participants considered the implementation of POCUS in primary care as an opportunity to lower these barriers, improve diagnostic processes, and strengthen GPs' skills.

Conclusion: Our findings make it clear that the use of ultrasound currently depends largely on the individual commitment of GPs - in terms of the time involved and the financial resources required. However, it is also clear that POCUS could offer the potential to improve the conditions for the use of ultrasound in GP practices. In this way, the introduction of POCUS may improve diagnostic workflows and their accessibility in primary care.

点护理超声在德国一般做法:机会和障碍的定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书