Initial Development and Content Validity of an Occupation-Focused Assessment: Occupations in Higher Education Transitions Inventory.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Karen M Keptner, Rachel Rogers, Alyssa Chandler Lee, Daniel Martin
{"title":"Initial Development and Content Validity of an Occupation-Focused Assessment: Occupations in Higher Education Transitions Inventory.","authors":"Karen M Keptner, Rachel Rogers, Alyssa Chandler Lee, Daniel Martin","doi":"10.1177/15394492261490096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>University students face occupational disruption during post-secondary transitions, yet existing campus screening tools leave occupational challenges largely unassessed. No comprehensive, occupation-focused screening instrument exists for this population. To describe the theoretical development and content validation of the <i>Occupations in Higher Education Transitions Inventory</i> (<i>OHETI</i>), a screening tool assessing university student adaptation across 10 domains of occupation grounded in the Theory of Occupational Adaptation (OA) a five-phase iterative development process was used: (a) initial item generation; (b) preliminary expert review for face validity (<i>N</i> = 3 occupational therapists with expertise in OA theory); (c) tool reconceptualization based on expert feedback; (d) cognitive interviews with undergraduate students for face validity and comprehensibility (<i>N</i> = 10); and (e) formal content validation using a Content Validity Index (CVI) rating procedure with (<i>N</i> = 6) occupational therapy professionals with clinical and academic experience with emerging adult students. Initial item generation yielded 68 items across seven OA constructs. Expert feedback prompted a fundamental restructuring, producing 116 items across 10 occupations, covering aspects of relative mastery: satisfaction, effectiveness, and efficiency. Revision based on student cognitive interviews resulted in 122 items. Formal content validation produced I-CVI scores ranging from 0.667 to 1.0, with S-CVI scores of 0.9516 for clarity and 0.9435 for relevance. Two items were removed, resulting in a final tool of 120 scorable items across 10 occupations. The <i>OHETI</i> demonstrates strong content and face validity as a theoretically grounded, occupation-focused screening tool for university students. Online administration and individualized feedback distinguish it from existing instruments. Psychometric validation is needed before broad implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492261490096"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492261490096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

University students face occupational disruption during post-secondary transitions, yet existing campus screening tools leave occupational challenges largely unassessed. No comprehensive, occupation-focused screening instrument exists for this population. To describe the theoretical development and content validation of the Occupations in Higher Education Transitions Inventory (OHETI), a screening tool assessing university student adaptation across 10 domains of occupation grounded in the Theory of Occupational Adaptation (OA) a five-phase iterative development process was used: (a) initial item generation; (b) preliminary expert review for face validity (N = 3 occupational therapists with expertise in OA theory); (c) tool reconceptualization based on expert feedback; (d) cognitive interviews with undergraduate students for face validity and comprehensibility (N = 10); and (e) formal content validation using a Content Validity Index (CVI) rating procedure with (N = 6) occupational therapy professionals with clinical and academic experience with emerging adult students. Initial item generation yielded 68 items across seven OA constructs. Expert feedback prompted a fundamental restructuring, producing 116 items across 10 occupations, covering aspects of relative mastery: satisfaction, effectiveness, and efficiency. Revision based on student cognitive interviews resulted in 122 items. Formal content validation produced I-CVI scores ranging from 0.667 to 1.0, with S-CVI scores of 0.9516 for clarity and 0.9435 for relevance. Two items were removed, resulting in a final tool of 120 scorable items across 10 occupations. The OHETI demonstrates strong content and face validity as a theoretically grounded, occupation-focused screening tool for university students. Online administration and individualized feedback distinguish it from existing instruments. Psychometric validation is needed before broad implementation.

以职业为中心评估的初步发展与内容效度:高等教育职业转型量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书