{"title":"The Geopolitics of Expert Knowledge: Analysing the European Commission's Role and Influence in Indonesian Higher Education.","authors":"Sotiria Grek, Hilary MacDonogh","doi":"10.1057/s41307-025-00429-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Building on a rich set of policy documents and interview data, and using the concept of the epistemic infrastructure, the article focuses on an analysis of how European HE expert actors became the preferred advisers for Indonesia's HE quality assurance system. As the article shows, working towards the quality assurance of higher education institutions in Indonesia serves not only for the apparent purpose of offering technocratic and rational solutions to improving HE governance and delivery, but also for the parallel aim of expanding the role and influence of European higher education in other world regions and zones of influence. Given the role and identity of the EU as a political project, as well as the specific mission that has been assigned to European universities as custodians and carriers of European liberal values, the work of European experts in Indonesia has geopolitical value and significance; it thus allows us to examine the geopolitics of expert knowledge production as a new and complex space of interactions, possibilities and contradictions that calls for a nuanced and careful analytical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"39 3","pages":"769-794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-025-00429-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building on a rich set of policy documents and interview data, and using the concept of the epistemic infrastructure, the article focuses on an analysis of how European HE expert actors became the preferred advisers for Indonesia's HE quality assurance system. As the article shows, working towards the quality assurance of higher education institutions in Indonesia serves not only for the apparent purpose of offering technocratic and rational solutions to improving HE governance and delivery, but also for the parallel aim of expanding the role and influence of European higher education in other world regions and zones of influence. Given the role and identity of the EU as a political project, as well as the specific mission that has been assigned to European universities as custodians and carriers of European liberal values, the work of European experts in Indonesia has geopolitical value and significance; it thus allows us to examine the geopolitics of expert knowledge production as a new and complex space of interactions, possibilities and contradictions that calls for a nuanced and careful analytical approach.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy.
The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome.
Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues
The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section
Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.