Governing relational opportunity in hybrid work: structural relational deprivation and the reproduction of workplace inequality.

IF 2.3 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1955187
Nthabeleng Innocentia Mdhluli
{"title":"Governing relational opportunity in hybrid work: structural relational deprivation and the reproduction of workplace inequality.","authors":"Nthabeleng Innocentia Mdhluli","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2026.1955187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hybrid work changes not only where employees work but also how they access the relationships through which information, support, development and recognition are obtained. This article argues that employee relations scholarship has paid insufficient attention to how organisations govern and distribute this access. It introduces relational opportunity governance, defined as the formal and informal rules, managerial decisions, technological arrangements, resource allocations and voice institutions through which access to employment-relevant relationships is enabled, constrained and contested. It also develops structural relational deprivation, a work-system condition in which such access is persistently, systematically and consequentially restricted or unevenly distributed across identifiable groups, roles or organisational arrangements. Drawing on a critical integrative review of South African and international scholarship on hybrid work, employee relations, organisational inequality, workplace networks and digital communication, the article identifies eligibility, temporal coordination, developmental and informational arrangements, performance-evaluation and recognition arrangements, material provision and voice institutions. It proposes that restricted relational access may weaken employees' network position, relational confidence, visibility and organisational influence, thereby reducing their capacity to exercise effective voice and challenge the arrangements that produced the disadvantage. Exposure may vary across occupational, organisational and materially differentiated groups, although demographic patterns require direct empirical investigation. The article reconceptualises hybrid work as a question of governance, power and distributive fairness rather than location or communication frequency. Six propositions and a provisional governance typology are advanced to guide future multilevel and longitudinal research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"11 ","pages":"1955187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1955187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid work changes not only where employees work but also how they access the relationships through which information, support, development and recognition are obtained. This article argues that employee relations scholarship has paid insufficient attention to how organisations govern and distribute this access. It introduces relational opportunity governance, defined as the formal and informal rules, managerial decisions, technological arrangements, resource allocations and voice institutions through which access to employment-relevant relationships is enabled, constrained and contested. It also develops structural relational deprivation, a work-system condition in which such access is persistently, systematically and consequentially restricted or unevenly distributed across identifiable groups, roles or organisational arrangements. Drawing on a critical integrative review of South African and international scholarship on hybrid work, employee relations, organisational inequality, workplace networks and digital communication, the article identifies eligibility, temporal coordination, developmental and informational arrangements, performance-evaluation and recognition arrangements, material provision and voice institutions. It proposes that restricted relational access may weaken employees' network position, relational confidence, visibility and organisational influence, thereby reducing their capacity to exercise effective voice and challenge the arrangements that produced the disadvantage. Exposure may vary across occupational, organisational and materially differentiated groups, although demographic patterns require direct empirical investigation. The article reconceptualises hybrid work as a question of governance, power and distributive fairness rather than location or communication frequency. Six propositions and a provisional governance typology are advanced to guide future multilevel and longitudinal research.

管理混合型工作中的关系机会:结构性关系剥夺和工作场所不平等的再现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书