Detection of Cervical Nodal Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy: Ex Vivo Diagnostic Modeling Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2026-10-13 DOI:10.2196/103960
Waseem Jerjes, Zaid Hamdoon, Dara Rashed, Colin Hopper
{"title":"Detection of Cervical Nodal Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy: Ex Vivo Diagnostic Modeling Study.","authors":"Waseem Jerjes, Zaid Hamdoon, Dara Rashed, Colin Hopper","doi":"10.2196/103960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical nodal metastasis remains one of the strongest determinants of treatment planning and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology remains the reference standard, but it does not provide immediate information at the point of surgical specimen assessment. Elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) offers rapid, label-free optical interrogation of tissue microstructure, and may support ex vivo nodal assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ESS combined with machine learning classification for ex vivo detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center observational ex vivo diagnostic modeling study in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma undergoing primary tumor resection and neck dissection. A total of 3 ESS spectra were acquired from each bivalved lymph node before routine histopathological processing. Internal validation used repeated nested 5-fold cross-validation grouped by patient, so every spectrum and lymph node from a patient remained in the same fold. All preprocessing, scaling, dimensionality reduction, within-model-family configuration, and hyperparameter tuning, probability calibration where required, and decision-threshold selection were restricted to training data within the nested validation process; comparisons between candidate model families were exploratory and were based on pooled patient-grouped out-of-fold predictions. Spectrum-level probabilities were aggregated within each lymph node, and histopathology was the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients were assessed for eligibility, 45 were included, and 280 fresh lymph nodes were assessed by ESS; 96 were pathology positive, and 184 were pathology negative. Of 840 acquired spectra, 760 passed quality control. Of the 280 nodes, 274 retained at least 2 usable spectra and comprised the analytical cohort; 6 pathology-negative nodes yielded no analyzable node-level ESS result. The hybrid model was selected because it had the highest pooled patient-grouped out-of-fold node-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), with an internally validated, exploratory estimate of 0.966 (95% CI 0.929-0.988). The same out-of-fold predictions informed model-family selection and performance reporting; this estimate does not represent independent validation of a prospectively fixed final model. At the cross-validation-derived summary threshold, secondary descriptive operating characteristics were sensitivity 93.8% (95% CI 86.4%-97.6%), specificity 95.5% (95% CI 90.1%-98.3%), accuracy 94.9% (95% CI 90.4%-97.3%), positive predictive value 91.8% (95% CI 82.9%-96.3%), and negative predictive value 96.6% (95% CI 92.4%-98.8%). The Brier score was 0.063, with calibration-in-the-large of -0.03 and a calibration slope of 0.94. Patient-level sensitivity was 96% and specificity was 90%. Pathology-positive and pathology-negative nodes also showed differences across amplitude-related and shape-related spectral features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESS showed promising ex vivo discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in this single-center model-development and internal-validation study. The findings support further investigation of ESS as a potential pathology-triage adjunct rather than a replacement for histopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"12 ","pages":"e103960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/103960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical nodal metastasis remains one of the strongest determinants of treatment planning and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology remains the reference standard, but it does not provide immediate information at the point of surgical specimen assessment. Elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) offers rapid, label-free optical interrogation of tissue microstructure, and may support ex vivo nodal assessment.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ESS combined with machine learning classification for ex vivo detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: We conducted a single-center observational ex vivo diagnostic modeling study in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma undergoing primary tumor resection and neck dissection. A total of 3 ESS spectra were acquired from each bivalved lymph node before routine histopathological processing. Internal validation used repeated nested 5-fold cross-validation grouped by patient, so every spectrum and lymph node from a patient remained in the same fold. All preprocessing, scaling, dimensionality reduction, within-model-family configuration, and hyperparameter tuning, probability calibration where required, and decision-threshold selection were restricted to training data within the nested validation process; comparisons between candidate model families were exploratory and were based on pooled patient-grouped out-of-fold predictions. Spectrum-level probabilities were aggregated within each lymph node, and histopathology was the reference standard.

Results: A total of 52 patients were assessed for eligibility, 45 were included, and 280 fresh lymph nodes were assessed by ESS; 96 were pathology positive, and 184 were pathology negative. Of 840 acquired spectra, 760 passed quality control. Of the 280 nodes, 274 retained at least 2 usable spectra and comprised the analytical cohort; 6 pathology-negative nodes yielded no analyzable node-level ESS result. The hybrid model was selected because it had the highest pooled patient-grouped out-of-fold node-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), with an internally validated, exploratory estimate of 0.966 (95% CI 0.929-0.988). The same out-of-fold predictions informed model-family selection and performance reporting; this estimate does not represent independent validation of a prospectively fixed final model. At the cross-validation-derived summary threshold, secondary descriptive operating characteristics were sensitivity 93.8% (95% CI 86.4%-97.6%), specificity 95.5% (95% CI 90.1%-98.3%), accuracy 94.9% (95% CI 90.4%-97.3%), positive predictive value 91.8% (95% CI 82.9%-96.3%), and negative predictive value 96.6% (95% CI 92.4%-98.8%). The Brier score was 0.063, with calibration-in-the-large of -0.03 and a calibration slope of 0.94. Patient-level sensitivity was 96% and specificity was 90%. Pathology-positive and pathology-negative nodes also showed differences across amplitude-related and shape-related spectral features.

Conclusions: ESS showed promising ex vivo discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in this single-center model-development and internal-validation study. The findings support further investigation of ESS as a potential pathology-triage adjunct rather than a replacement for histopathology.

弹性散射光谱检测口腔鳞状细胞癌宫颈结转移:离体诊断模型研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书