What Does It Mean to Be Cured?: Perspectives from Individuals Living with Sickle Cell Disease.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Marilyn S Baffoe-Bonnie
{"title":"What Does It Mean to Be Cured?: Perspectives from Individuals Living with Sickle Cell Disease.","authors":"Marilyn S Baffoe-Bonnie","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2026.2741040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and gene therapies for sickle cell disease (SCD) are frequently described as cures in scientific literature, clinical spaces, and media reports. Yet, little empirical research has examined how individuals living with SCD perceive the meaning of \"cure\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 24-month period, ethnographic observations were conducted at a single large clinical research site alongside semi-structured interviews with 25 participants (23 individuals living with SCD and 2 caregivers of children with SCD). Participants represented diverse treatment trajectories, including those who did and did not undergo HSCT or gene therapy. Adult participants ranged in age from 18 to 41, and the children of the caregiver participants were under 12 years of age. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive and abductive thematic and narrative analytic approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes characterized participants' perceptions of cure: (1) cure as symptom management and eradication; (2) cure as freedom from social and structural burdens; (3) cure as identity disruption and continuity; and (4) cure as tradeoff. These themes were further organized by three cross-cutting analytic dimensions - temporality, contestation, and embodiment - that shaped how participants articulated cure across clinical and social contexts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal a critical divergence between biomedical framings and patient perceptions of cure. As cell and gene therapies expand into clinical practice and public discourse, aligning technological descriptions with lived experience will be essential to prevent misplaced expectations, strengthen trust, and support more socially integrated approaches to clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2026.2741040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and gene therapies for sickle cell disease (SCD) are frequently described as cures in scientific literature, clinical spaces, and media reports. Yet, little empirical research has examined how individuals living with SCD perceive the meaning of "cure".

Methods: Over a 24-month period, ethnographic observations were conducted at a single large clinical research site alongside semi-structured interviews with 25 participants (23 individuals living with SCD and 2 caregivers of children with SCD). Participants represented diverse treatment trajectories, including those who did and did not undergo HSCT or gene therapy. Adult participants ranged in age from 18 to 41, and the children of the caregiver participants were under 12 years of age. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive and abductive thematic and narrative analytic approaches.

Results: Four themes characterized participants' perceptions of cure: (1) cure as symptom management and eradication; (2) cure as freedom from social and structural burdens; (3) cure as identity disruption and continuity; and (4) cure as tradeoff. These themes were further organized by three cross-cutting analytic dimensions - temporality, contestation, and embodiment - that shaped how participants articulated cure across clinical and social contexts.

Conclusion: These findings reveal a critical divergence between biomedical framings and patient perceptions of cure. As cell and gene therapies expand into clinical practice and public discourse, aligning technological descriptions with lived experience will be essential to prevent misplaced expectations, strengthen trust, and support more socially integrated approaches to clinical translation.

被治愈意味着什么?镰状细胞病患者的观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书