Avoiding "shiny objects" and heeding "red flags": a sensemaking framework for emerging technology procurement.

IF 4.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2026-10-12 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag201
Wiljeana Glover, Dessislava Pachamanova, Derick R Simmons, Robin Sodano, Eric Alper
{"title":"Avoiding \"shiny objects\" and heeding \"red flags\": a sensemaking framework for emerging technology procurement.","authors":"Wiljeana Glover, Dessislava Pachamanova, Derick R Simmons, Robin Sodano, Eric Alper","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health systems can be vulnerable to \"shiny object syndrome,\" adopting unneeded emerging technologies (ETs), or may ignore \"red flags\" if they rely on linear health technology procurement processes that exclude the influence of information exchanges between the health system, vendors, and industry partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conduct a post-hoc comparison of 2 procured communication-related clinical workflow ETs and examine ET-related IT Committee meetings within an academic medical center. We apply sensemaking theory, highlighting examples where sense-giving, sense-demanding, and sense-breaking were present or absent across stakeholders during procurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Present (or absent) sensemaking dynamics demonstrated reciprocity (or lack thereof) across all 3 sensemaking components. Sense-breaking particularly informed committee meetings, leading to new technological and organizational infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our emergent sensemaking ET procurement framework offers 3 actionable recommendations: formalize multi-stakeholder information exchange roles, treat vendor responsiveness to sense-demanding as a selection criterion, and use each procurement cycle to surface and address foundational governance and infrastructure gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"9 5","pages":"ooag201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Health systems can be vulnerable to "shiny object syndrome," adopting unneeded emerging technologies (ETs), or may ignore "red flags" if they rely on linear health technology procurement processes that exclude the influence of information exchanges between the health system, vendors, and industry partners.

Methods: We conduct a post-hoc comparison of 2 procured communication-related clinical workflow ETs and examine ET-related IT Committee meetings within an academic medical center. We apply sensemaking theory, highlighting examples where sense-giving, sense-demanding, and sense-breaking were present or absent across stakeholders during procurement.

Results: Present (or absent) sensemaking dynamics demonstrated reciprocity (or lack thereof) across all 3 sensemaking components. Sense-breaking particularly informed committee meetings, leading to new technological and organizational infrastructure.

Conclusions: Our emergent sensemaking ET procurement framework offers 3 actionable recommendations: formalize multi-stakeholder information exchange roles, treat vendor responsiveness to sense-demanding as a selection criterion, and use each procurement cycle to surface and address foundational governance and infrastructure gaps.

避免“闪亮之物”,注意“危险信号”:新兴技术采购的语义框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书