Transitioning from template-based groin dissection to dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: Prospective validation of a standardization step.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Gagan Prakash, Sarah Shaikh, Amandeep Arora, Mahendra Pal, Ankit Misra, Ajit Gujela, Ganesh Bakshi, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Archi Agrawal, Santosh Menon
{"title":"Transitioning from template-based groin dissection to dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: Prospective validation of a standardization step.","authors":"Gagan Prakash, Sarah Shaikh, Amandeep Arora, Mahendra Pal, Ankit Misra, Ajit Gujela, Ganesh Bakshi, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Archi Agrawal, Santosh Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSNB) offers accurate inguinal staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) penile cancer (PeCa), but implementation requires multidisciplinary expertise and standardization. We evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol during transition from modified/superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (MILD/SILD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, non-randomized phase II study, 20 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0 PeCa underwent DSNB followed by MILD and SILD in both groins. DSNB used 99mTc-nanocolloid and indocyanine green (ICG). Sentinel nodes were identified using lymphoscintigraphy/SPECT-CT, gamma-probe and near-infrared fluorescence, and assessed by frozen section. Final SILD pathology served as the reference standard for calculating the false-negative rate (FNR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty groins were evaluated. DSNB successfully identified sentinel nodes in 37/40 (92.5%) groins; ICG identified nodes in 36 (90%) compared with 28 (70%) for 99mTc. Five groins contained metastatic sentinel nodes, all detected by DSNB, yielding 100% sensitivity and 0% FNR. In 4/37 (10.8%) successful procedures, sentinel nodes lay outside the MILD template. Median sentinel node yield was 4 versus 12 nodes with SILD. Median drain duration and hospital stay were 21 and 3 days, respectively. Eleven patients (55%) had no complications; grade 2 and 3a complications occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively. After median follow-up of 34 months, no inguinal nodal recurrences occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol was feasible and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy during phased implementation at a tertiary cancer centre. Initial validation alongside template dissection may facilitate safe adoption, particularly in settings without centralized PeCa services.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.09.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSNB) offers accurate inguinal staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) penile cancer (PeCa), but implementation requires multidisciplinary expertise and standardization. We evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol during transition from modified/superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (MILD/SILD).

Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized phase II study, 20 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0 PeCa underwent DSNB followed by MILD and SILD in both groins. DSNB used 99mTc-nanocolloid and indocyanine green (ICG). Sentinel nodes were identified using lymphoscintigraphy/SPECT-CT, gamma-probe and near-infrared fluorescence, and assessed by frozen section. Final SILD pathology served as the reference standard for calculating the false-negative rate (FNR).

Results: Forty groins were evaluated. DSNB successfully identified sentinel nodes in 37/40 (92.5%) groins; ICG identified nodes in 36 (90%) compared with 28 (70%) for 99mTc. Five groins contained metastatic sentinel nodes, all detected by DSNB, yielding 100% sensitivity and 0% FNR. In 4/37 (10.8%) successful procedures, sentinel nodes lay outside the MILD template. Median sentinel node yield was 4 versus 12 nodes with SILD. Median drain duration and hospital stay were 21 and 3 days, respectively. Eleven patients (55%) had no complications; grade 2 and 3a complications occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively. After median follow-up of 34 months, no inguinal nodal recurrences occurred.

Conclusion: A standardized dual-tracer DSNB protocol was feasible and demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy during phased implementation at a tertiary cancer centre. Initial validation alongside template dissection may facilitate safe adoption, particularly in settings without centralized PeCa services.

从基于模板的腹股沟解剖过渡到阴茎癌的动态前哨淋巴结活检:标准化步骤的前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书