Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in advanced small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-08-28 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2026-1433
Peipei Zhang, Weixing Zhao, Jiayun Ma, Yuan Li, Huiyuan Peng, Jun Jiang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in advanced small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.","authors":"Peipei Zhang, Weixing Zhao, Jiayun Ma, Yuan Li, Huiyuan Peng, Jun Jiang","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2026-1433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are being evaluated in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the available trials include different targets, constructs, doses, and treatment settings. We aimed to determine the overall range of reported activity and safety while clarifying whether the evidence supports a clinically uniform ADC class effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), clinical-trial registries, and major oncology conference proceedings were searched from inception through July 31, 2026. Eligibility was restricted to reports with sufficient methodological and outcome information available in English; study country, recruitment region, investigator nationality, and participant ethnicity were not exclusion criteria. Prospective phase I-III studies of ADC monotherapy in adults with advanced, extensive-stage, relapsed, or refractory SCLC were eligible; no comparator was required, and only the ADC arm of comparative trials contributed to the single-arm synthesis. Outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinically important safety events. Randomized trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and non-comparative studies using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Random-effects models were used, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen prospective studies comprising 20 analytic cohorts and 2,246 patients were included: 12 phase I/Ib/I-II studies, three phase II studies, and three phase III studies. The pooled ORR was 34.38% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.96-44.43%; I<sup>2</sup>=95.3%], and the pooled DCR was 77.50% (95% CI: 67.98-85.81%; I<sup>2</sup>=94.7%). The pooled median DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.99 months (95% CI: 4.24-5.86; I<sup>2</sup>=77.2%), 4.36 months (95% CI: 3.87-4.92; I<sup>2</sup>=84.8%), and 7.48 months (95% CI: 6.15-9.10; I<sup>2</sup>=92.6%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by intervention and target indicated substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Safety was summarized by individual agent, dose, and source population because adverse-event definitions and denominators were not sufficiently comparable; the predominant hematologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and neurologic signals varied among products. Cochrane risk-of-bias judgments were predominantly low risk, with selected domains rated unclear or high risk. MINORS scores ranged from 11 to 15 of 16, with recurrent limitations in consecutive enrollment, blinded endpoint assessment, follow-up reporting, and prospective sample-size calculation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADC-based therapy shows antitumor activity in advanced SCLC, but substantial clinical and pharmacological heterogeneity limits the interpretation of pooled single-arm estimates. Agent-specific randomized trials with standardized efficacy, safety, and biomarker reporting are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2026-1433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are being evaluated in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the available trials include different targets, constructs, doses, and treatment settings. We aimed to determine the overall range of reported activity and safety while clarifying whether the evidence supports a clinically uniform ADC class effect.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), clinical-trial registries, and major oncology conference proceedings were searched from inception through July 31, 2026. Eligibility was restricted to reports with sufficient methodological and outcome information available in English; study country, recruitment region, investigator nationality, and participant ethnicity were not exclusion criteria. Prospective phase I-III studies of ADC monotherapy in adults with advanced, extensive-stage, relapsed, or refractory SCLC were eligible; no comparator was required, and only the ADC arm of comparative trials contributed to the single-arm synthesis. Outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinically important safety events. Randomized trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and non-comparative studies using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Random-effects models were used, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results: Eighteen prospective studies comprising 20 analytic cohorts and 2,246 patients were included: 12 phase I/Ib/I-II studies, three phase II studies, and three phase III studies. The pooled ORR was 34.38% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.96-44.43%; I2=95.3%], and the pooled DCR was 77.50% (95% CI: 67.98-85.81%; I2=94.7%). The pooled median DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.99 months (95% CI: 4.24-5.86; I2=77.2%), 4.36 months (95% CI: 3.87-4.92; I2=84.8%), and 7.48 months (95% CI: 6.15-9.10; I2=92.6%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by intervention and target indicated substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Safety was summarized by individual agent, dose, and source population because adverse-event definitions and denominators were not sufficiently comparable; the predominant hematologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and neurologic signals varied among products. Cochrane risk-of-bias judgments were predominantly low risk, with selected domains rated unclear or high risk. MINORS scores ranged from 11 to 15 of 16, with recurrent limitations in consecutive enrollment, blinded endpoint assessment, follow-up reporting, and prospective sample-size calculation.

Conclusions: ADC-based therapy shows antitumor activity in advanced SCLC, but substantial clinical and pharmacological heterogeneity limits the interpretation of pooled single-arm estimates. Agent-specific randomized trials with standardized efficacy, safety, and biomarker reporting are needed.

抗体-药物偶联物治疗晚期小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:前瞻性临床试验的系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。
背景:抗体-药物偶联物(adc)在晚期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)中的应用正在被评估,但现有的试验包括不同的靶点、结构、剂量和治疗设置。我们的目的是确定报告的活性和安全性的总体范围,同时澄清证据是否支持临床统一的ADC类别效应。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、临床试验注册库和主要肿瘤学会议记录,检索时间为2026年7月31日。资格仅限于具有足够的方法和结果信息的英文报告;研究国家、招募地区、研究者国籍和参与者种族不是排除标准。ADC单药治疗晚期、大分期、复发或难治性SCLC成人的前瞻性I-III期研究符合条件;不需要比较物,只有比较试验的ADC臂有助于单臂合成。结果包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和临床重要安全事件。随机试验使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估,非比较研究使用非随机研究方法学指数(minor)进行评估。采用随机效应模型,进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。结果:纳入了18项前瞻性研究,包括20个分析队列和2246例患者:12项I/Ib/I-II期研究,3项II期研究和3项III期研究。合并ORR为34.38%[95%置信区间(CI): 24.96 ~ 44.43%;I2=95.3%],合并DCR为77.50% (95% CI: 67.98 ~ 85.81%; I2=94.7%)。合并中位DOR、PFS和OS分别为4.99个月(95% CI: 4.24-5.86; I2=77.2%)、4.36个月(95% CI: 3.87-4.92; I2=84.8%)和7.48个月(95% CI: 6.15-9.10; I2=92.6%)。亚组分析的干预和目标显示显著的临床和统计异质性。由于不良事件的定义和分母没有足够的可比性,安全性按单个药物、剂量和源人群进行总结;主要的血液学、胃肠道、肺部和神经学信号因产品而异。Cochrane偏倚风险判断主要是低风险,选定的领域被评为不清楚或高风险。未成年人的评分范围为11至15分(16分),在连续入组、盲法终点评估、随访报告和前瞻性样本量计算中存在复发性限制。结论:adc为基础的治疗在晚期SCLC中显示出抗肿瘤活性,但大量的临床和药理学异质性限制了汇总单组估计的解释。需要具有标准化疗效、安全性和生物标志物报告的药物特异性随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书