Pei Jiao, Chen Chen, Koudong Zhang, Qian Sun, Can Wang
{"title":"Development and external validation of an XGBoost-based prognostic model for small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.","authors":"Pei Jiao, Chen Chen, Koudong Zhang, Qian Sun, Can Wang","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2026-1263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and brain metastases (BM) have poor and heterogeneous survival outcomes, while existing prognostic tools have shown limited discriminatory performance. We aimed to develop an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) based prognostic model and perform preliminary external validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with small cell lung cancer and brain metastases (SCLCBM) diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for model development and internal testing. External validation was performed in an independent single-center Chinese cohort. Variables screened by univariable Cox regression and retained in multivariable Cox regression analyses were used as predictors in the XGBoost models. Grid search was used for hyperparameter tuning, and candidate parameter combinations were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the areas under the curves (AUCs) and confusion matrices, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret model predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 7,692 patients from the SEER database and 128 patients in the external validation cohort. The final models incorporated demographic, tumor-related, treatment-related, and metastatic factors, including age, sex, T and N stages, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and extracranial metastases. AUCs for 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-month overall survival (OS) were 0.840, 0.801, 0.738, and 0.759 in the internal testing cohort and 0.779, 0.790, 0.739, and 0.763 in the external cohort, respectively. SHAP analysis consistently ranked chemotherapy as the most influential predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The XGBoost models showed moderate discrimination across the evaluated prediction horizons in both the internal testing cohort and a small single-center external cohort. Further validation in larger, prospective, multicenter cohorts is required before clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2026-1263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and brain metastases (BM) have poor and heterogeneous survival outcomes, while existing prognostic tools have shown limited discriminatory performance. We aimed to develop an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) based prognostic model and perform preliminary external validation.
Methods: Patients with small cell lung cancer and brain metastases (SCLCBM) diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for model development and internal testing. External validation was performed in an independent single-center Chinese cohort. Variables screened by univariable Cox regression and retained in multivariable Cox regression analyses were used as predictors in the XGBoost models. Grid search was used for hyperparameter tuning, and candidate parameter combinations were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the areas under the curves (AUCs) and confusion matrices, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret model predictions.
Results: The study included 7,692 patients from the SEER database and 128 patients in the external validation cohort. The final models incorporated demographic, tumor-related, treatment-related, and metastatic factors, including age, sex, T and N stages, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and extracranial metastases. AUCs for 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-month overall survival (OS) were 0.840, 0.801, 0.738, and 0.759 in the internal testing cohort and 0.779, 0.790, 0.739, and 0.763 in the external cohort, respectively. SHAP analysis consistently ranked chemotherapy as the most influential predictor.
Conclusions: The XGBoost models showed moderate discrimination across the evaluated prediction horizons in both the internal testing cohort and a small single-center external cohort. Further validation in larger, prospective, multicenter cohorts is required before clinical use.
期刊介绍:
Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.