Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 cohorts through June 30, 2026.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-08-11 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2026-1021
Yunliang Lu, Biaoyou Chen, Jingfeng Ye, Xinyi Hu, Tingting Jiang, Zhe Zhang, Tingting Huang
{"title":"Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 cohorts through June 30, 2026.","authors":"Yunliang Lu, Biaoyou Chen, Jingfeng Ye, Xinyi Hu, Tingting Jiang, Zhe Zhang, Tingting Huang","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2026-1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous meta-analyses have linked an elevated pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to poor outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but they included few recent cohorts and often combined adjusted and unadjusted estimates. We updated the evidence base and evaluated the consistency and certainty of the associations between pretreatment NLR and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data from inception through June 30, 2026. Eligible reports were cohort studies of pathologically confirmed NPC that compared high versus low pretreatment NLR and reported multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), or locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects models, prespecified subgroup analyses, leave-one-out analyses, assessment of small-study effects, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty assessment were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cohorts comprising 11,671 patients were included; NOS scores ranged from 7 to 9. Elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with inferior OS [27 cohorts; HR: 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-2.66] and PFS (18 cohorts; HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.45-2.00). Furthermore, high NLR correlated with compromised DMFS (6 cohorts; HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.33-1.93) and LRFS (2 cohorts; HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.51-15.31). Heterogeneity was substantial for OS (I<sup>2</sup>=84%) and moderate for PFS (I<sup>2</sup>=57%). Egger's tests indicated funnel-plot asymmetry for OS (P<0.001), but not PFS (P=0.26). GRADE certainty was very low for OS and PFS and low for DMFS and LRFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with poorer survival outcomes in NPC. However, substantial heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects for OS, and low to very low certainty of evidence preclude routine clinical implementation. Prospective validation using standardized sampling and cutoff methods is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2026-1021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous meta-analyses have linked an elevated pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to poor outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but they included few recent cohorts and often combined adjusted and unadjusted estimates. We updated the evidence base and evaluated the consistency and certainty of the associations between pretreatment NLR and survival outcomes.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data from inception through June 30, 2026. Eligible reports were cohort studies of pathologically confirmed NPC that compared high versus low pretreatment NLR and reported multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), or locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects models, prespecified subgroup analyses, leave-one-out analyses, assessment of small-study effects, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty assessment were used.

Results: Thirty cohorts comprising 11,671 patients were included; NOS scores ranged from 7 to 9. Elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with inferior OS [27 cohorts; HR: 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-2.66] and PFS (18 cohorts; HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.45-2.00). Furthermore, high NLR correlated with compromised DMFS (6 cohorts; HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.33-1.93) and LRFS (2 cohorts; HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.51-15.31). Heterogeneity was substantial for OS (I2=84%) and moderate for PFS (I2=57%). Egger's tests indicated funnel-plot asymmetry for OS (P<0.001), but not PFS (P=0.26). GRADE certainty was very low for OS and PFS and low for DMFS and LRFS.

Conclusions: Elevated pretreatment NLR was associated with poorer survival outcomes in NPC. However, substantial heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects for OS, and low to very low certainty of evidence preclude routine clinical implementation. Prospective validation using standardized sampling and cutoff methods is needed.

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在鼻咽癌中的预后价值:一项截至2026年6月30日的30个队列的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书