Multi-cohort validation of BRAF-PTPRT co-mutation as a predictor of favorable immunotherapy response in melanoma.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-09-02 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2026-1745
Dongmei Han, Caihong Wu, Dan Wang, Hao Jin, Weishuai Liu
{"title":"Multi-cohort validation of <i>BRAF-PTPRT</i> co-mutation as a predictor of favorable immunotherapy response in melanoma.","authors":"Dongmei Han, Caihong Wu, Dan Wang, Hao Jin, Weishuai Liu","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2026-1745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has transformed melanoma therapy, but predictive biomarkers remain suboptimal. <i>BRAF</i> is the most common driver mutation, yet its single-gene association with ICB response remains inconsistent. <i>PTPRT</i> loss activates STAT3-driven immunity. We hypothesized that concurrent <i>BRAF</i> and <i>PTPRT</i> mutations (co-mutation) synergistically enhance immunogenicity and predict ICB benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed three independent cohorts: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) (n=320, ICB-treated), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n=448, mixed treatments), and a combined ICB cohort (CS, n=436). Patients were categorized into four groups: co-mutation, <i>BRAF+/PTPRT-</i>, <i>BRAF-/PTPRT+</i>, double wild-type (WT). Overall survival (OS), tumor mutational burden (TMB), neo-antigen load, clinical benefit, immune infiltration, and transcriptomic pathways were evaluated. A simplified risk score (0-2) was constructed by assigning 1 point for co-mutation and 1 point for high TMB (above median) to predict clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ICB-treated cohorts (MSK and CS), only co-mutation consistently predicted superior OS, while single mutations showed no consistent benefit. Co-mutated tumors exhibited significantly higher TMB and neo-antigen loads, an immune-inflamed microenvironment with elevated M1 macrophages, reduced Tregs, and upregulation of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), CTLA-4, TIM-3, as well as enrichment of IFN-γ and IL6-JAK-STAT3 pathways. The combined risk score (co-mutation + TMB) predicted clinical benefit with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.659. Patients with high-risk score (2 points) demonstrated significantly higher clinical benefit rates compared to low-risk score (0 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>BRAF-PTPRT</i> co-mutation is a robust, cross-cohort predictive biomarker for ICB response in melanoma. A simple risk score integrating co-mutation and TMB further improves patient stratification. Routine testing of both genes may guide immunotherapy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2026-1745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has transformed melanoma therapy, but predictive biomarkers remain suboptimal. BRAF is the most common driver mutation, yet its single-gene association with ICB response remains inconsistent. PTPRT loss activates STAT3-driven immunity. We hypothesized that concurrent BRAF and PTPRT mutations (co-mutation) synergistically enhance immunogenicity and predict ICB benefit.

Methods: We analyzed three independent cohorts: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) (n=320, ICB-treated), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n=448, mixed treatments), and a combined ICB cohort (CS, n=436). Patients were categorized into four groups: co-mutation, BRAF+/PTPRT-, BRAF-/PTPRT+, double wild-type (WT). Overall survival (OS), tumor mutational burden (TMB), neo-antigen load, clinical benefit, immune infiltration, and transcriptomic pathways were evaluated. A simplified risk score (0-2) was constructed by assigning 1 point for co-mutation and 1 point for high TMB (above median) to predict clinical benefit.

Results: In ICB-treated cohorts (MSK and CS), only co-mutation consistently predicted superior OS, while single mutations showed no consistent benefit. Co-mutated tumors exhibited significantly higher TMB and neo-antigen loads, an immune-inflamed microenvironment with elevated M1 macrophages, reduced Tregs, and upregulation of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), CTLA-4, TIM-3, as well as enrichment of IFN-γ and IL6-JAK-STAT3 pathways. The combined risk score (co-mutation + TMB) predicted clinical benefit with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.659. Patients with high-risk score (2 points) demonstrated significantly higher clinical benefit rates compared to low-risk score (0 points).

Conclusions: BRAF-PTPRT co-mutation is a robust, cross-cohort predictive biomarker for ICB response in melanoma. A simple risk score integrating co-mutation and TMB further improves patient stratification. Routine testing of both genes may guide immunotherapy decisions.

BRAF-PTPRT共突变作为黑色素瘤有利免疫治疗反应的预测因子的多队列验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书