A clinical model for identifying proliferative lupus nephritis: a multicenter study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Zishan Lin, Wenfeng Wang, Xintian Li, Fan Wu, Lihan Lin, Menglan Huang, Yufeng Liang, Zugang Xie, Caiming Chen, Jianxin Wan, Hong Chen, Yanfang Xu
{"title":"A clinical model for identifying proliferative lupus nephritis: a multicenter study.","authors":"Zishan Lin, Wenfeng Wang, Xintian Li, Fan Wu, Lihan Lin, Menglan Huang, Yufeng Liang, Zugang Xie, Caiming Chen, Jianxin Wan, Hong Chen, Yanfang Xu","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) is associated with poorer renal outcomes than non-proliferative lupus nephritis. Although kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for histologic classification, its use may be limited by invasiveness, contraindications, and limited healthcare access. We aimed to develop and externally validate a noninvasive model for identifying PLN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, 443 patients with biopsy-confirmed lupus nephritis from five centers were included. The development cohort comprised 337 patients from center A, and the external validation cohort included 106 patients from centers B to E. Candidate predictors were screened using univariable analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, followed by multivariable logistic regression to construct the final nomogram. Internal validation was performed using 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model incorporated seven predictors, namely lymphocyte percentage, hematuria, leukocyturia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, uric acid, anti-dsDNA positivity, and C3. The model showed good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.852 in the development cohort and 0.895 in the external validation cohort. Calibration was acceptable in both cohorts, and decision curve analysis suggested potential clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed and externally validated a noninvasive clinical model based on routinely available clinical variables for identifying PLN. This model may provide a practical tool for risk stratification and support clinical evaluation in patients with lupus nephritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) is associated with poorer renal outcomes than non-proliferative lupus nephritis. Although kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for histologic classification, its use may be limited by invasiveness, contraindications, and limited healthcare access. We aimed to develop and externally validate a noninvasive model for identifying PLN.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 443 patients with biopsy-confirmed lupus nephritis from five centers were included. The development cohort comprised 337 patients from center A, and the external validation cohort included 106 patients from centers B to E. Candidate predictors were screened using univariable analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, followed by multivariable logistic regression to construct the final nomogram. Internal validation was performed using 5-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling.

Results: The final model incorporated seven predictors, namely lymphocyte percentage, hematuria, leukocyturia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, uric acid, anti-dsDNA positivity, and C3. The model showed good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.852 in the development cohort and 0.895 in the external validation cohort. Calibration was acceptable in both cohorts, and decision curve analysis suggested potential clinical utility.

Conclusion: We developed and externally validated a noninvasive clinical model based on routinely available clinical variables for identifying PLN. This model may provide a practical tool for risk stratification and support clinical evaluation in patients with lupus nephritis.

鉴别增殖性狼疮肾炎的临床模型:一项多中心研究。
目的:增殖性狼疮性肾炎(PLN)与非增殖性狼疮性肾炎相比,肾脏预后较差。尽管肾活检仍然是组织学分类的金标准,但它的使用可能受到侵入性、禁忌症和医疗保健渠道有限的限制。我们的目标是开发和外部验证一种用于识别PLN的非侵入性模型。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,纳入了来自五个中心的443例活检证实的狼疮性肾炎患者。发展队列包括来自A中心的337名患者,外部验证队列包括来自B中心至e中心的106名患者,使用单变量分析、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归筛选候选预测因子,然后使用多变量logistic回归构建最终的nomogram。内部验证采用5倍交叉验证和自举重采样进行。结果:最终模型纳入了7个预测因子,即淋巴细胞百分比、血尿、白细胞尿、肾小球滤过率、尿酸、抗dsdna阳性和C3。该模型具有良好的辨别能力,受试者工作特征曲线下面积在发展组为0.852,在外部验证组为0.895。校准在两个队列中都是可接受的,决策曲线分析显示了潜在的临床应用。结论:我们开发并外部验证了一种基于常规可用临床变量的无创临床模型,用于识别PLN。该模型可为狼疮性肾炎患者的风险分层和临床评价提供实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书