Andrea Della Penna, Steffen Hartleif, Markus Quante, Silvio Nadalin
{"title":"Ex-vivo right posterior sectionectomy for large-for-size mismatch in pediatric liver transplant recipients.","authors":"Andrea Della Penna, Steffen Hartleif, Markus Quante, Silvio Nadalin","doi":"10.1007/s00423-026-04320-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Large-for-size mismatch remains a major challenge in pediatric and small recipient liver transplantation, particularly when full-size deceased-donor grafts are allocated and conventional splitting is not feasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of seven pediatric and adolescent recipients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) with ex-vivo right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) between 2018 and 2022. Grafts were considered oversized based on an integrated surgical assessment including graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), recipient abdominal anatomy, graft morphology, and expected graft fit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median GRWR decreased from 4.7% to 2.2%, allowing graft implantation in all cases. Primary abdominal closure was achieved in six recipients, while one required delayed closure for large-for-size syndrome (LFS). No cases of severe LFS with hemodynamic, ventilatory, or graft perfusion compromise were observed. Major complications occurred in three patients, including one biliary complication requiring surgical revision, one primary graft failure requiring retransplantation, and one death unrelated to graft size or transplant surgery. At a median follow-up of 59.5 months among surviving recipients, six of seven patients were alive; five retained their original graft, while one was alive with a functioning second graft after retransplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ex-vivo RPS appears to be a technically feasible rescue graft reduction strategy in highly selected pediatric recipients when conventional graft reduction techniques are not feasible. Given the limited cohort size and the occurrence of primary graft failure and mortality, its safety and efficacy require further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"411 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13669043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04320-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Large-for-size mismatch remains a major challenge in pediatric and small recipient liver transplantation, particularly when full-size deceased-donor grafts are allocated and conventional splitting is not feasible.
Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of seven pediatric and adolescent recipients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) with ex-vivo right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) between 2018 and 2022. Grafts were considered oversized based on an integrated surgical assessment including graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), recipient abdominal anatomy, graft morphology, and expected graft fit.
Results: Median GRWR decreased from 4.7% to 2.2%, allowing graft implantation in all cases. Primary abdominal closure was achieved in six recipients, while one required delayed closure for large-for-size syndrome (LFS). No cases of severe LFS with hemodynamic, ventilatory, or graft perfusion compromise were observed. Major complications occurred in three patients, including one biliary complication requiring surgical revision, one primary graft failure requiring retransplantation, and one death unrelated to graft size or transplant surgery. At a median follow-up of 59.5 months among surviving recipients, six of seven patients were alive; five retained their original graft, while one was alive with a functioning second graft after retransplantation.
Conclusion: Ex-vivo RPS appears to be a technically feasible rescue graft reduction strategy in highly selected pediatric recipients when conventional graft reduction techniques are not feasible. Given the limited cohort size and the occurrence of primary graft failure and mortality, its safety and efficacy require further evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.